hi!
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Sara Golemon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, well... the main pieces of feedback I'd give on it then is to not
> change the behavior of the '!' modifier. That's bad BC.
Fully agreed, if we can avoid the introduction of yet another set of
#ifdef, then I'm all for it.
> Rather, introduce
> a new modifier for checking if a parameter was passed. Secondly, make
> these two separate patches as the new modifier is a separate feature from
> the single-arg parameter parsing.
Agreed here too.
Cheers,
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org