Re: Documenting Namespace (Was Late FQCN resolution using ::class)

From: Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:19:09 +0000
Subject: Re: Documenting Namespace (Was Late FQCN resolution using ::class)
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message 
Pierre Joye wrote:

hi Lester,

Please stop hijacking threads with all possible off topics and to use
uppercase to improve your arguments (or lack of).

Thanks for your understanding, take #42.


Get a life, actually read the discussion and follow the list RULES ....
The question came up due to trying to handle namespace/class with phpdoc comments, so switching the thread to expand on that seems perfectly logical?
Hence I've change the thread name ....


On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Lester Caine <[email protected]> wrote:

Benjamin Eberlei wrote:


Sorry, forgot to post inline. Thanks for mentioning it and doing it wrong
yourself, made me laugh ;-) But you are right.


Actually if you check, it was quoted in the right place ;)

But it is getting VERY annoying that a few people choose to ignore the lists
requested style and blindly top post even when the discussion is nicely
interleaved. It just does not work in these sort of discussions? :(

I'd missed the significance of the initial thread but the problems of now
documenting these sorts of 'changes' to language does need to be addressed?
HOPEFULLY without forcing 'annotation' on us when there is already many
years of good quality docblock documentation in many major libraries?


-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

Thread (16 messages)

« previous php.internals (#66237) next »