Re: Documenting Namespace (Was Late FQCN resolution using ::class)
2013.02.26. 19:00, "Ralph Schindler" <[email protected]> ezt írta:
>
>
>> I'd missed the significance of the initial thread but the problems of
>> now documenting these sorts of 'changes' to language does need to be
>> addressed? HOPEFULLY without forcing 'annotation' on us when there is
>
>
> I am still working on docs for this, perhaps if docs were not in SVN,
things would be easier. I should have something by the weekend.
could you ellaborate?
I fail to see why would the choice of vcs would matter in this.
or maybe you are referring to the docbook format?
Thread (16 messages)