2013/7/23 Igor Wiedler <[email protected]>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> The reason is precisely to avoid BC breaks, such as the one that you
> quoted from the FAQ.
>
> Are you suggesting that such a BC break is acceptable for 5.6?
>
I don't fear BCs and actually I prefer BCs against weak compromises. This
depends on the weight of the BC ;)
But aside: I am a regular user, not a core-dev or something. I just comment.
>
> As much as I dislike introducing new syntax, keeping BC was the reason I
> did so.
>
>
--
github.com/KingCrunch