Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the suggestion. Since it is less straight-forward I would rather just move forward with
the current syntax. I'd hate to see the proposal rejected because people did not like the
syntax.
Regards,
Igor
On Aug 8, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Daniel Bingham <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Igor,
>
> I love the RFC, but how about:
>
> use bar\baz() as baz;
>
> As an alternative to "use function". Still new syntax, but a little less wordy. I
> have nothing for "use const", but "use const" feels more natural to me than
> "use function" does.
>
> Just an idea for pondering!
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michael Wallner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 August 2013 14:29, Igor Wiedler <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I just wanted to bump this topic, since there's not been much feedback during the
> > last few weeks. Comments on the patch are also welcome.
> >
> > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use_function
> > Patch: https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/388
> >
>
> I like it. It improves the state for non-OOP in PHP.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>