On 09/12/2013 06:43 AM, Philip Sturgeon wrote:
> As for the comments about the FIG made by others, I agree with Larry
> in that we're doing a pretty good job at trying to build on the
> example set forward by internals. Self moderation and workflow are two
> important factors to the group, and I don't feel like this 4 point
> list is the sort of workflow anyone should be trying to follow or
> enforce.
I'm not sure I'm getting what you're trying to say here:
If it only is about the workflow in FIG, ok, maybe that should be looked
at and put out more descriptively on this list instead of people telling
to go read something somewhere.
If it is about what FIG does, then I disagree - because while I love
what FIG has been come up with (in terms of contents partly and of it
being done at all fully) - I think it has no place in internals and is
very well off as a seperate entity. Like I find a coding standard set by
the language developers kind of nuts. (Go pun not intended, because in
Go it has been there from the public beta version, not introduced like
15 years after inception. Same with Python, afaik it was a PEP that was
basically accepted by the community at large)
Greetings,
Florian