Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC

From: Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:49:12 +0000
Subject: Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Robert Stoll <[email protected]> wrote:

> Since the RFC has not included my concerns so far I am going to bring them
> up again. The included validation of
> signatures is a huge BC break and thus a no-go for PHP 5.x IMO:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/blcph3p377x4ycmc#query:+page:1+mid:jtfa52bzgsua7yrt+state:results
>
> http://markmail.org/message/blcph3p377x4ycmc#query:+page:1+mid:u5y2pvzttbudkxqe+state:results


Kindly reread the RFC and my last message in this thread. The RFC states
the signature validation as an "open question" and my last mail states that
it was decided not to include signature validation. So where did you get
the idea of it being "included"?

Nikita


Thread (29 messages)

« previous php.internals (#71087) next »