Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC

From: Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:00:02 +0000
Subject: Re: Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC
References: 1 2  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On 12/01/14 15:39, Robert Stoll wrote:
Since the RFC has not included my concerns so far I am going to bring them up again. The included validation of signatures is a huge BC break and thus a no-go for PHP 5.x IMO: http://markmail.org/message/blcph3p377x4ycmc#query:+page:1+mid:jtfa52bzgsua7yrt+state:results http://markmail.org/message/blcph3p377x4ycmc#query:+page:1+mid:u5y2pvzttbudkxqe+state:results The error/warning on conflictive parameter names could be done just when calling with named parameters.


Thread (29 messages)

« previous php.internals (#71095) next »