On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Gordon Oheim <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01.02.2014 20:25, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> FYI, I'm voting "No" as I don't think
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor-promotion
>> was considered
>> adequately. They both seek to accomplish the same goal, but one
>> introduces conflicting syntax while the other does not.
>>
>> If we're to go with the conflicting syntax, I'd like to see a
>> reasonable argument why.
>>
> How is it conflicting?
>
Because it's different from already existing syntax (Code exists in
the wild using HHVM's version of the syntax -
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor-promotion
). I'm not sure which
part you're confused about.
-Sara