Re: [VOTE][RFC] Array Of
Adam Harvey wrote on 28.02.2014 19:00:
> On 28 February 2014 09:45, Andrea Faulds <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Feb 2014, at 17:30, Bob Weinand <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I voted no now.
>>>
>>> a) This is something for PHP6 I feel (at least if the other RFCs were
>>> rejected for similar reasons)
>>> b) We are so close to beta 5.6 now, I think we should stop introducing bigger
>>> features which affect the language etc. now
>>> c) I'm not really sure if we want that feature… but that's another story...
>>
>>
>> I also voted against. I don’t like the [] syntax and PHP 5.6 is too close.
>
> I was also -1, partly for those reasons, but also because I think we
> need to take some time (probably in a PHP 5++/6/7/whatever context and
> after 5.6 has been frozen) to figure out if we want generics and, if
> so, what form they would take syntactically. My guess is that they
> won't look anything like ClassName[], and I don't really want another
> weird syntax appendix that we have to maintain and document for a
> decade or more to come.
>
> Adam
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
What about adding isarrayof to class declaration?
class DbRow {}
class DbRows isarrayof DbRow {}
function test(DbRows $rows) {}
Regards,
Thomas
Thread (13 messages)