Re: [VOTE][RFC] Array Of
On 1 Mar 2014, at 15:08, Philip Sturgeon <[email protected]> wrote:
> This should not even be seen as a rush to implement a weak version
> that ruins things and gives us a weird double syntax. It should be
> seen as a simple version then if later on generics are implemented
> they are a much more powerful feature which has a different syntax.
> People can use [] without ever having to understand the complexity of
> generics and templates and all that.
People can also use Array<Foo> without fully understanding generics.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/
Thread (13 messages)