Skip to content

__cplusplus value should not be used to decide for std::unique_ptr #350: #351

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

Dani-Hub
Copy link
Contributor

@Dani-Hub Dani-Hub commented Sep 6, 2015

In addition to the C++ language version define __cplusplus also check _CPPLIB_VER for better Dinkumware support.

…en-source-parsers#350:

In addition to the C++ language version define __cplusplus also check _CPPLIB_VER for better Dinkumware support.
@cdunn2001
Copy link
Contributor

I lost track of the conversation on this. Was there any objection?

If not, could you rebase this to the current tip of master?

@Dani-Hub
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm not aware of any objections. Should I select "Close and comment" instead of "Comment" to signal that I'm happy?

@cdunn2001
Copy link
Contributor

That looks like a merge-commit. Could you rebase? If you don't know how, that's fine. I can do it.

@BillyDonahue
Copy link
Contributor

I just learned the difference between rebase and merge commits:
http://git-scm.com/book/ch3-6.html Might be helpful.

@Dani-Hub
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, I'll try a rebase this evening.

@Dani-Hub
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was busy the last two days, but please let my try to that on my own during the weekend.

@Dani-Hub
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by the rebased pull request #367

@Dani-Hub Dani-Hub closed this Sep 27, 2015
@cdunn2001
Copy link
Contributor

Note that you can rebase a pull-request without opening a new one:

git rebase ...
git push -f origin issue-350-unique_ptr

GitHub would magically update this PR. It's a nice feature.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants