Losers stay losing. the-democrat

  • Krauerking@lemy.lol
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It wasnt even binding. It was just a suggestion to be open about it resolution and they said they would pass a "more broad" suggestion which just means less effort and hope the vagueness covers everyone's good intentions...

    What is with idiots insisting that everyone is inherently good when we can see for a fact a not small sized chunk is very clearly pretty shit including themselves.

    • Infamousblt [any]M
      ·
      2 days ago

      They just cannot envision a world in which genocide is bad. They love it. They have to have it. Genocide is like air to the average American politician

      • Self_Sealing_Stem_Bolt [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, ask a lib, who cares what kind, what their "better world" looks like and get ready to cringe out of your skin. Its always just, capitalism but it just magically works. Baby brain shit. They cant imagine a better world, only one that gets worse a little slower.

  • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Democratic Party needs the Republicans, so they have to screw up just as badly to maintain the status quo. You can't have a Good Cop/Bad Cop schtick if you write the Bad Cop out of the show.

  • culpritus [any]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Russia Russia Russia

    the-democrat

    But what about AIPAC?

    not-listening

  • plinky [he/him]
    ·
    1 day ago

    Democrats main job is shock absorbance, they seem to be doing very well at it, not a peep of discontent from their piggies. The left most significant win is electing, believe it or not, a democrat

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ok, maybe Tucker Carlson will become president, goddamn they never learn

    • BobDole [none/use name]
      ·
      1 day ago

      What is going on? Used to be you could accept money from AIPAC. Not anymore!
      tucker-catboy

    • 9to5 [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      2 days ago

      IF. Republicans run a (for their base) decent candidate like Tucker instead of Vance they have a realistic shot at winning....cause yeah Tucker isnt Trump you see.

    • Runcible [none/use name]
      ·
      2 days ago

      it's only foreign interference if it comes from russia otherwise it's just intervention

    • LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins [none/use name]
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well obviously smol bean Israel can't influence anything that would be like the tail wagging the dog! Now, watch as an entire generation of politicians fall on a literal field of swords for entirely unrelated reasons, unable to offer even a symbolic resistance

  • mrfugu [he/him, any]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not even a bill to ban it just an empty resolution. Very cool guys very vertebrae-like

  • copandballtorture [ey/em]
    ·
    2 days ago

    At least two potential 2028 Democratic nominees may have played a role in killing the resolution, with one DNC member telling Politico they received direct calls from the presidential hopefuls expressing concern about the resolution.

    The DNC resolutions committee also punted on two other resolutions on recognizing a Palestinian state and conditioning military aid to Israel.

    They don't tell who the two potential nominees are.

    From the linked politico article, solely including to highlight guy's name

    James Zogby — a longtime DNC member and critic of Israel who is president of the Arab American Institute and who sits on Martin’s Middle East Working Group — said the party needs to wake up to voters’ shifting views on Israel.

  • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]
    ·
    2 days ago

    the-democrat I simply cannot believe you commies are SOOO anti-Semitic as to claim this group, which we won't even pretend to do nothing to oppose their outsized influence on us for fear of risking their displeasure, has an outsized influence on us. For shame!

  • Goferking0@ttrpg.network
    ·
    2 days ago

    Still waiting for dnc chair Ken Martin to make things better like people keep saying and said when he got elected. Any day now

  • Lussy [he/him, des/pair]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Isn’t this the new line? Condemning AIPAC would be antisemitism because it’d imply the Jewish lobby is controlling everything. DNC is on the ball!