piefed.nullspace
RobotToaster, robottoaster@mander.xyz
Instance: mander.xyz
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 55
Comments: 323
Posts and Comments by RobotToaster, robottoaster@mander.xyz
c/nottheonion
RobotToaster
c/til
c/technology
c/technology
c/science
Comments by RobotToaster, robottoaster@mander.xyz
Ask LemmyIt’s blocked by lemmy.world, like half the fediverse is.
Mander and most other instances don’t block them.
Fediverse memes@feddit.uk
I can understand twitter, it’s years of inertia, but threads was the next big thing for all of a week.
Fediverse memes@feddit.uk
The usual trick is to post an image along with “link in the comments”.
Fediverse memes@feddit.uk
People actually use threads?
I assumed everyone had moved on to mastodon/bluesky or crawled back to xitter.
With all the fuckups recently, a random lemming getting added to a white house war crime chat wouldn’t even surprise me at this point.
To be fair, declaring war on the pope is a time honoured Christian tradition.
What do you mean there’s no quick load on this game?
No Stupid QuestionsMany saints just took on the stories and aspects of pagan gods or heroes.
Because the people the spend all day on relationship subreddits are bitter and want everyone else to be.
How fucking hard is it to put a $2 ultrasonic distance sensor on the front. I built robots when I was a kid that wouldn’t do this.
This has been solved for 50 years FFS. Yet here we are with techbros thinking cameras can solve everything.
I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.
Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?
Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).
I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.
Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.
AutismJust make sure the label isn’t attached by the overlock seam that holds the garment together, I’ve seen a few things with tags attached like that.
AndroidTo be fair it’s kinda reassuring, if they had a professional PR team I’d be suspicious it’s a government honeypot.
Of course that could just be what they want us to think.
linuxmemesI imagine they have an embedded raspberry pi type computer in the screen itself.
I wonder what the Graphene owner’s calm and reasonable response to this will be?
It’s blocked by lemmy.world, like half the fediverse is.
Mander and most other instances don’t block them.
I can understand twitter, it’s years of inertia, but threads was the next big thing for all of a week.
The usual trick is to post an image along with “link in the comments”.
People actually use threads?
I assumed everyone had moved on to mastodon/bluesky or crawled back to xitter.
With all the fuckups recently, a random lemming getting added to a white house war crime chat wouldn’t even surprise me at this point.
To be fair, declaring war on the pope is a time honoured Christian tradition.
What do you mean there’s no quick load on this game?
Many saints just took on the stories and aspects of pagan gods or heroes.
Because the people the spend all day on relationship subreddits are bitter and want everyone else to be.
How fucking hard is it to put a $2 ultrasonic distance sensor on the front. I built robots when I was a kid that wouldn’t do this.
This has been solved for 50 years FFS. Yet here we are with techbros thinking cameras can solve everything.
Are OnlyFans models the best way to explain the climate crisis? (theguardian.com)
https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/stupidpol/comments/1sfyo4r/are_onlyfans_models_the_best_way_to_explain_the/
I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.
Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?
Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).
I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.
Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.
Just make sure the label isn’t attached by the overlock seam that holds the garment together, I’ve seen a few things with tags attached like that.
To be fair it’s kinda reassuring, if they had a professional PR team I’d be suspicious it’s a government honeypot.
Of course that could just be what they want us to think.
I imagine they have an embedded raspberry pi type computer in the screen itself.
I wonder what the Graphene owner’s calm and reasonable response to this will be?