I guess you could say this is Elon’s plan but with extra “steps” badum’tsh

See this comment is funny because there are two ways to interpret this comment: There are other notable examples OR that those previous examples weren’t bloodthirsty monsters, but even if I asked subscribers of either belief which they were they would both claim the former.

I remember people used to get mad about emojis on Reddit because it was a more desktop-oriented site years ago. There was a running gag that only 🗿 was allowed.

Thats fair, and it’s also a bigger problem now that people are using bots to feign user engagement.

Too amphibian, not reptilian enough.

The only notable attempts at communism, and the ones who vehemently claim to be communists, were the USSR and the CCP, both of which were/are the most violent and oppressive regimes in modern history.

Like it or not, if more people use the term to describe something different than you then that’s what the term actually means.

Labor Reforms came from public pressure and legislative action, not 1,200 coalminers killing 20 people and lighting a coal mine on fire, 500 getting arrested, and dissolving their own organization due to lack of funds. The organization literally didn’t exist when the reforms happened.

If you claim you don’t see how rising diaper costs hurts normal people I think you’re just coping hard.

As it is a response to the unarguable fact I posted before, I’m not even gonna bother to read this, peace out.

Those diapers belong to nobody, now. We all have less access to diapers. I named so many examples and yet here you are refusing any course of action that minimizes harm done to common people. You don’t seem to care about billionaires you just want the people of the USA to hurt themselves.

Russia isn’t shit on paper, they’ve got a supreme leader with no term limits whose opponents keep becoming reluctant porn stars or dying in mysterious ways.

Fun fact about the end of the Weimar Republic, for three consecutive elections the left and the communist parties failed to form a coalition even with the majority of seats leading to on the fourth election the Nazis sweeping the right and becoming the majority they needed to take complete control. Sound familiar? A division among leftists caused by external forces leading into Fascism?

This bro literally thinks the French Aristocracy were coerced into writing their constitution…

I have no words.

NO THEY DIDN’T THEY BURNT DOWN A WAREHOUSE FULL OF SUPPLIES WHICH BELONGED TO THE COMPANY. MICHAEL HSU IS GETTING PAID THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT AFTER THIS.

Not the third party staffing agency, not a bank, not his office, not his cars, none of that. A giant pile of diapers that people needed, that’s what.

To them it was a numeric figure on a piece of paper, to the rest of us it was necessary supplies. The owner isn’t even a billionaire, the CEO has about 12M Net Worth.

That’s not what their sign says, though. You posted a Zapatistas sign that says it’s free and uncorrupt, and the DPRK has the same sign.

The Zapatistas live in isolation surrounded by a bunch of men with guns, it sounds less like freedom and more like constant threat of violence to keep people in line.

This might be illegal, but it is NOT a method of effecting needed change. I’m not promoting Arson at all over organizing unions and promoting progressive reform, but if you’re going to burn something down at least target their financials and personal properties.

It’s really telling that you think the rise of the USSR was a fitting example on your list, you Tankie scum.

This whole argument hinges on the fact that things never changed when different parties come into power, which is demonstrably false.

If this were his house I wouldn’t be berating people for celebrating it, but it’s actually a warehouse full of diapers and toiletries.

The warehouse doesn’t pay anybody, the warehouse holds supplies. The owners of the warehouse, who live in Texas, pay people and they’re incentivized not to change their ways because it’s still more profitable to pay low wages, as are the people who own the empty lot next. If anything the outcome of this is 1) less jobs and 2) rising prices under the guise of shortage.

You could in theory keep burning Kimberly Clark warehouses until they’re forced to liquidate the company and file bankruptcy, but at that point they will either be immediately replaced by another company perhaps worse, or you will simply make it impossible for mothers to obtain diapers for their children, which will among other repercussions have serious effects on public hygiene. Also, the boardmembers and CEO Michael Hsu are definitely walking away from it rich af.