How many women in Africa do the 22 richest women in the world have more than?

Safeguard the democratic system. Re-establish the division of powers. Deal with the influence of money in a democracy. Bring Republicans to justice for their constitutional and legal violations and treason against the constitution. Disempowerment private and corporate entities from their overwhelming influencing on legislation, taxation and law. Bring everyone involved in the Epstein shit to justice. Deal with the partisanship of the supreme courts. Eliminate the electoral college. Force fair distracting in states. Bring corporate risk taking to an end. Massively increase funding for the IRS to go after the wealthy for tax evasion. Institute strict regulations for media companies to dela with propaganda and media monopolies. Break up the big banks so they are small enough to let fail.

If they campaign on gender and equality or some other social justice causes and don’t focus on the things that are threatening to break society, I’m going to be done with the dems. If the dem base, after everything that’s happened, hasn’t learned enough to redirected their priorities and values to the things that fundamentally matter to ensure the system functions, then they deserve their fate.

How much we want to bet the first big budget live action movie from the Zelda franchise will not feature Link as the main character or hero but will put the princess as the hero, main protagonist and will have to save Link from himself at some point?

Just-in-time economics.

Their skillset is gaining and retaining power, which is why once they have it all, the entire nation turns into a system to protect their power, ala Putin and North Korea. They do not have a skillset of leadership.

The motives are irrelevant. This will destroy the internet as we know it and disempower citizens. I can’t help but wonder if the empowerment LLMs may have to an individual is terrifying leaders into an authoritarian mindset, finally demanding to be able to know and track what we do online, everywhere we do it. This is about protecting their ability to rule, not children from harm.

This underlies an important risk in off-loading cognition to AI. People won’t understand what they are doing if they trust it will get them what they want. Hurting themselves or others will be inevitable and they won’t have realized their course of action would. Human contribution to the relationship with AI will be expressing desires and actioning on the steps the computer outputs. Everything in between will be an unnecessary to know, unknown.

What happened doesn’t matter as much as the story you tell about what happened.

Nowhere is this more manifest than Trump’s obsession with what he can’t have, loyalty.

He knows his only value is what he can provide for others and as soon as they get more utility elsewhere, they leave. This is also why he uses fear to prevent attrition, the deal they get for ‘betrayal’ must overwhelm their fear of Trump, which is dependent on his power to act on the threats, which is partly why he wants absolute power. As soon as that damn cracks and the first successful betrayal is visible, his followers will see him as powerless and begin scouting for offers to betray him as well and it all collapses. That is the exact scenario Trump fears most, the lack of power to keep people loyal. Either by offering them the most or by terrorizing them into obedience. Both can fail and inevitably, as his mind fails him and his incompetence reduces both the rewards and the ability to punish, both will fail.

Moisture doesn’t dry off in sealed plastic. Regardless, it is advertised as an amount it isn’t, a weight that could be measured at the checkout scale and priced accurately to account for that, and isn’t, by choice.

Anyways, it’s 419g, not 4.19 KG, so this is 6%, not 0.6%. I mistyped in my post and have edited that, apologies.

That sound like emotional needs being met through pets. Bringing animals into existence to satisfy people’s like for them.

As hard as that shit goes, we will probably never see an age of human piloted robots.

I don’t recall but it is quite possible.

I do not mean it will be tolerable to be near. I mean citizens of nations who choose war will tolerate it more if their own soldiers are not dying in war. If war requires less people and more “stuff” to wage, citizens will feel less motivation to speak out against it. It will make waging war more of an option not less of one, if only equipment is being lost.

Are they that terrible or is this mostly a corporate propaganda campaign against Facebook? We’re all on every camera and microphone pointed in our direction 24/7 already because ppl couldn’t figure out we shouldn’t turn every nation into a corporate surveillance state.

That feminist can go too far? Definitely not isolated to me.

What is happening, then? Why do people have pets?

So does save on foods. My ground chicken just this past Sunday was marked at .429k but were all 3.95kg when I measured to portion.

Edit: .419kg not 4.19KG

The age of drone on drone violence will make war more palatable to citizens.