Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
From: Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 20:30:42 +0000 Subject: Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local) References: 1 2 3 4 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 18:53 +0100, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] wrote: > There was a proposal for exactly this a few years ago, which ended up > in an RFC with a slightly different syntax (using a declare() > statement), but was declined in voting by 35 votes to 2. Sorry, I forgot the link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use_global_elements On 2 August 2024 19:46:03 BST, Nick Lockheart <[email protected]> wrote: >In all likelihood, it was the syntax that was disfavored. There was a lot of discussion beforehand about the syntax, and the RFC attempts to summarise some of it, but skimming through the voting thread <https://externals.io/message/108306> I don't think that was what made it fail. The objections seem to be mostly about the general approach, not the details. Rowan Tommins [IMSoP]
Thread (112 messages)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
« previous | php.internals (#124726) | next » |
---|