Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
From: John Coggeshall Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 19:47:01 +0000 Subject: Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local) References: 1 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Aug 23 2024, at 3:41 pm, Rowan Tommins [IMSoP] <[email protected]> wrote: > > None of these seem like showstoppers to me, but since we can so easily go one step further to > "global only", and avoid them, why wouldn't we? FWIW I'd support global only, specifically because of the point I wouldn't necessarily want the change to hamstring our ability to add new functions in the future.
Thread (112 messages)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative fu nction lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
- Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
« previous | php.internals (#125167) | next » |
---|