Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)

From: Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:56:30 +0000
Subject: Re: [Concept] Flip relative function lookup order (global, then local)
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message


On Aug 22 2024, at 4:09 am, Rob Landers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If you have the ability to inject arbitrary code, you've already lost. It doesn't
> matter whether they use this feature, or just register a shutdown function, autoloader, replace
> classes/functions/methods entirely, or whatever. Should we remove those features as well?
I think it's a fallacy to claim "well if they got this far the game is over" when it
comes to application security. There are a million ways an attacker could use this feature to
covertly gain access to things like passwords before they are encrypted, etc. that would enable
lateral movement within an organization that otherwise they might have difficulty achieving even
with RCE in a properly locked down system (e.g. PHP doesn't have the ability to write to the
filesystem / overwrite existing classes, etc.)
Regarding the subject at hand I've made my case here and we can agree to disagree -- changing
the function lookup order is an easy win with security benefits and, according to Ilija, performance
benefits. I think it should be seriously considered.
John


Thread (112 messages)

« previous php.internals (#125097) next »