Re: [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory

From: Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:26:50 +0000
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Stas,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]>wrote:

> > This is informational function for programmers, not for programs.
> > It requires active session to be useful because it needs active save
> handler
> > module. It's rather suitable as phpinfo(), but it might not be useful
> > for users.
>
> I'd say it's better to leave this for the docs. If you write session
> handler, you document what it's supporting and what's not and that would
> be much easier to read than call a function and also much clearer -
> there you can describe what works and what not in detail.


No problem. I think it's dirty also :)
Let leave it to docs. It will be removed from code and RFC.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
[email protected]


Thread (42 messages)

« previous php.internals (#71783) next »