Re: Re: [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory

From: Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 01:39:56 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi all,

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Patrick Schaaf <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> If you insist on it being short/shorter, I'd go for
>>
>> unlocked_unsafe
>>
>> or
>>
>> unlocked
>>
>> because I think, and keep thinking, that having "unlocked" there best
>> defuses the traditional expectation that sessions are locked during the
>> whole script run - thus minimizing the surprise to programmers at the PHP
>> level.
>>
> Thank you for suggestions!
> I would like to use
>
> unlock
>

How about 'unsafe_lock'?
It may be better.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
[email protected]


Thread (42 messages)

« previous php.internals (#71913) next »