On Jun 4, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [VOTE] is a good idea, let's make it [VOTE].
>>
>>> There is no plugin used for it yet, and that's my problem with it.
>>
>> Well, votes aren't announced yet either :) I'll try to get it set up ASAP
>> and see how it works, before announcing the vote. It looks good in
>> description at least.
>
> Please keep them in the wiki as we planed to do. THere are plugins and
> it is very easy to manage, allows per section voting etc.
I'm hopeful people will continue to understand the RFC definition:
- RFC: Request For Comments
And while doing so, not revert to a vote (RFV?) simply because discussing a topic can get messy.
Voting has clear winners and losers with potential loss for improvements. That and you must then
worry about who can and cannot vote (i.e., non-inclusive community). It's rare that we've
required a formal vote, so I fear we will now implement voting at inappropriate times rather than
allow a consensus to be reached.
Also, people should be given a reasonable opportunity to offer an alternative RFC.
Regards,
Philip