On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 17:20, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Zeev Suraski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> Some of you may have followed the twitter conversation that Pierre and I had at the end of
>> last week; In my opinion, this dry (or partially wet) run that we had in the last few days of a
>> voting process pointed to several deficiencies that need to be addressed in the RFC release process
>> that need to be addressed before we move on.
>
> Fully agreed and it was the case for the array stuff and a consensus
> is clear here, and in favour of one the proposals. To make the point
> straight.
Say what?
Do people even know what they were voting for?
I have absolutely no idea whatsoever what is being voted on, so I haven't yet.
>> - The announcement will be done in a way that's easy to flag & follow, e..g. - by
>> [RFC] in the subject line followed by the title of the RFC. Again, the effective date will start
>> from the time this email is sent to the list, not any other time.
>
> Afaict, it is the case already.
Definitely not.
There is so much discussion about the array stuff now that I have no
idea what is being voted on.. People started counting votes before the
discussion even began.
-Hannes