Hi,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I've added session_create_id(). Therefore, if user start using it, it
>> > does
>> > not hart much.
>> > If users do not need modified session ID, they may call
>> > session_create_id()
>> > simply.
>>
>> Again with the "I've added this", that I opposed previously for
>> session_serializer_name(), session_gc() ... What's session_create_id()
>> useful for? How would you utilize it?
>
>
> You are asking to write RFC for all additions for _new_ release.
>
> I think session_gc() is must have API. IMHO.
> Periodic GC is better than probability based GC even with expire timestamp
> (I mean
> time stamp for session manager, not save handlers)
I'm not asking for RFC about everything new. But at least to my
knowledge, this wasn't even discussed - somebody might've suggested an
improvement to your idea. You just decide and add something without
others evaluating it, while at the same time, everybody else's feature
requests are put under cross-fire - this is unfair.
Anyway, you can disregard that, as I previously said - Leigh answered
all of my questions, including those about session_create_id() (might
be better to call it session_generate_id() though).
Cheers,
Andrey.