I might be missing something but I have to agree with
On 18 March 2014 07:44, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Doing to all this length for what? To rename a function? Looks hardly
> worth it.
The method is named as it is in userland because it maps 1:1 with the
underlying interface
open -> open
destroy -> destroy
create_sid -> create_sid
Seems like a big waste of time, and hassle for people who use it, when you
go around renaming things for the sake of it. Especially when that's all it
is, a rename, no extra functionality.