User Experience

Invisible UX is coming 🔥 And it’s going to change how we design products, forever. For decades, UX design has been about guiding users through an experience. We’ve done that with visible interfaces: Menus. Buttons. Cards. Sliders. We’ve obsessed over layouts, states, and transitions. But with AI, a new kind of interface is emerging: One that’s invisible. One that’s driven by intent, not interaction. Think about it: You used to: → Open Spotify → Scroll through genres → Click into “Focus” → Pick a playlist Now you just say: “Play deep focus music.” No menus. No tapping. No UI. Just intent → output. You used to: → Search on Airbnb → Pick dates, guests, filters → Scroll through 50+ listings Now we’re entering a world where you guide with words: “Find me a cabin near Oslo with a sauna, available next weekend.” So the best UX becomes barely visible. Why does this matter? Because traditional UX gives users options. AI-native UX gives users outcomes. Old UX: “Here are 12 ways to get what you want.” New UX: “Just tell me what you want & we’ll handle the rest.” And this goes way beyond voice or chat. It’s about reducing friction. Designing systems that understand intent. Respond instantly. And get out of the way. The UI isn’t disappearing. It’s mainly dissolving into the background. So what should designers do? Rethink your role. Going forward you’ll not just lay out screens. You’ll design interactions without interfaces. That means: → Understanding how people express goals → Guiding model behavior through prompt architecture → Creating invisible guardrails for trust, speed, and clarity You are basically designing for understanding. The future of UX won’t be seen. It will be felt. Welcome to the age of invisible UX. Ready for it?

⏱️ How To Measure UX (https://lnkd.in/e5ueDtZY), a practical guide on how to use UX benchmarking, SUS, SUPR-Q, UMUX-LITE, CES, UEQ to eliminate bias and gather statistically reliable results — with useful templates and resources. By Roman Videnov. Measuring UX is mostly about showing cause and effect. Of course, management wants to do more of what has already worked — and it typically wants to see ROI > 5%. But the return is more than just increased revenue. It’s also reduced costs, expenses and mitigated risk. And UX is an incredibly affordable yet impactful way to achieve it. Good design decisions are intentional. They aren’t guesses or personal preferences. They are deliberate and measurable. Over the last years, I’ve been setting ups design KPIs in teams to inform and guide design decisions. Here are some examples: 1. Top tasks success > 80% (for critical tasks) 2. Time to complete top tasks < 60s (for critical tasks) 3. Time to first success < 90s (for onboarding) 4. Time to candidates < 120s (nav + filtering in eCommerce) 5. Time to top candidate < 120s (for feature comparison) 6. Time to hit the limit of free tier < 7d (for upgrades) 7. Presets/templates usage > 80% per user (to boost efficiency) 8. Filters used per session > 5 per user (quality of filtering) 9. Feature adoption rate > 80% (usage of a new feature per user) 10. Time to pricing quote < 2 weeks (for B2B systems) 11. Application processing time < 2 weeks (online banking) 12. Default settings correction < 10% (quality of defaults) 13. Search results quality > 80% (for top 100 most popular queries) 14. Service desk inquiries < 35/week (poor design → more inquiries) 15. Form input accuracy ≈ 100% (user input in forms) 16. Time to final price < 45s (for eCommerce) 17. Password recovery frequency < 5% per user (for auth) 18. Fake email frequency < 2% (for email newsletters) 19. First contact resolution < 85% (quality of service desk replies) 20. “Turn-around” score < 1 week (frustrated users → happy users) 21. Environmental impact < 0.3g/page request (sustainability) 22. Frustration score < 5% (AUS + SUS/SUPR-Q + Lighthouse) 23. System Usability Scale > 75 (overall usability) 24. Accessible Usability Scale (AUS) > 75 (accessibility) 25. Core Web Vitals ≈ 100% (performance) Each team works with 3–4 local design KPIs that reflects the impact of their work, and 3–4 global design KPIs mapped against touchpoints in a customer journey. Search team works with search quality score, onboarding team works with time to success, authentication team works with password recovery rate. What gets measured, gets better. And it gives you the data you need to monitor and visualize the impact of your design work. Once it becomes a second nature of your process, not only will you have an easier time for getting buy-in, but also build enough trust to boost UX in a company with low UX maturity. [more in the comments ↓] #ux #metrics

𝗡𝗮𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗥𝗔𝗚 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼. 𝗜𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝗽. Embed → retrieve → generate looks clean in a notebook. Real requirements break it: → Questions whose answer is spread across many documents → Industry terms that embeddings get wrong → Bad chunks the pipeline never catches → Answers that live in how things connect, not in any single chunk → PDFs full of tables and images a text-only index cannot read These 5 architectures are how serious teams stay ahead in the agentic AI era: 𝟬𝟭 𝗛𝘆𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗥𝗔𝗚 → Dense vectors find meaning. BM25 finds exact words. → Reciprocal Rank Fusion combines both ranked lists. → A safe baseline for almost every team. 𝟬𝟮 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝗥𝗔𝗚 → Pull entities and their relationships into a knowledge graph. → Retrieve subgraphs and community summaries, not chunks. → Best when the answer lives in how things connect. 𝟬𝟯 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗔𝗚 → A planner agent picks the right tool: vector, web, or SQL. → A reasoner agent keeps trying until the answer is solid. → Retrieval becomes a plan, not a single step. 𝟬𝟰 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗥𝗔𝗚 (𝗖𝗥𝗔𝗚) → Grade every retrieval before you trust it. → Correct → answer. Unclear → rewrite the query. Wrong → search the web. → This is what production RAG actually looks like. 𝟬𝟱 𝗠𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗮𝗹 𝗥𝗔𝗚 → One embedding model (CLIP, ColPali) for text, images, and tables. → One vector index. One multimodal LLM. → No more separate pipelines for PDFs with charts. I built a runnable example for each of the five patterns. GitHub link in the first comment. The best teams in 2026 do not pick one. They combine them — hybrid retrieval inside an agentic loop, with a corrective grader, over a multimodal index. Naive RAG is a starting point, not a finish line. That is why most enterprise GenAI projects stall at the demo. Which of these five becomes the default RAG stack in the next 18 months — and which stays a specialized tool?

Last week, I described four design patterns for AI agentic workflows that I believe will drive significant progress: Reflection, Tool use, Planning and Multi-agent collaboration. Instead of having an LLM generate its final output directly, an agentic workflow prompts the LLM multiple times, giving it opportunities to build step by step to higher-quality output. Here, I'd like to discuss Reflection. It's relatively quick to implement, and I've seen it lead to surprising performance gains. You may have had the experience of prompting ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini, receiving unsatisfactory output, delivering critical feedback to help the LLM improve its response, and then getting a better response. What if you automate the step of delivering critical feedback, so the model automatically criticizes its own output and improves its response? This is the crux of Reflection. Take the task of asking an LLM to write code. We can prompt it to generate the desired code directly to carry out some task X. Then, we can prompt it to reflect on its own output, perhaps as follows: Here’s code intended for task X: [previously generated code] Check the code carefully for correctness, style, and efficiency, and give constructive criticism for how to improve it. Sometimes this causes the LLM to spot problems and come up with constructive suggestions. Next, we can prompt the LLM with context including (i) the previously generated code and (ii) the constructive feedback, and ask it to use the feedback to rewrite the code. This can lead to a better response. Repeating the criticism/rewrite process might yield further improvements. This self-reflection process allows the LLM to spot gaps and improve its output on a variety of tasks including producing code, writing text, and answering questions. And we can go beyond self-reflection by giving the LLM tools that help evaluate its output; for example, running its code through a few unit tests to check whether it generates correct results on test cases or searching the web to double-check text output. Then it can reflect on any errors it found and come up with ideas for improvement. Further, we can implement Reflection using a multi-agent framework. I've found it convenient to create two agents, one prompted to generate good outputs and the other prompted to give constructive criticism of the first agent's output. The resulting discussion between the two agents leads to improved responses. Reflection is a relatively basic type of agentic workflow, but I've been delighted by how much it improved my applications’ results. If you’re interested in learning more about reflection, I recommend: - Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback, by Madaan et al. (2023) - Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning, by Shinn et al. (2023) - CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing, by Gou et al. (2024) [Original text: https://lnkd.in/g4bTuWtU ]

Most brands spend a lot on media, but treat landing pages as an afterthought If you’re running ads and sending traffic to a homepage or a poorly built landing page, its almost criminal. Specially when gen AI has reduced the cost and time for content creation drastically Here’s how to get landing pages right. Consistently. 1. Match Intent, Not Just Aesthetics The #1 job of a landing page? Continue the conversation you started with your ad •If your ad says “energy efficient fans”, the landing page should show highlight this feature front and center •If your Google ad targets “Mixer Grinders under ₹5000,” don’t show ₹8000 models on the page. Message match > Visual design 2. Keep the Hero Section Clean & Focused Above-the-fold matters. You need to have •Clear headline – Say what the product is and why it’s special. •Key benefits – 3 crisp points max. •Visuals – High-quality product image or demo video. •CTA – One action. Not three. Buy Now,” “Book a Demo,” or “Know More”—but pick ONE 3. Product Benefits, Not Just Features Nobody cares that your mixer uses XYZ motor tech. I mean they do care but only if they care how it helps them They care a lot more that the mixer has a coarse mode which enables silbatta like texture resulting in great taste And that BLDC or intelligent motor tech enables it 4. Solve for Trust People are skeptical by default. Give them reasons to believe •Ratings & Reviews – Show real customer ratings (4.5 stars? Flaunt it). •Media Mentions – “As seen on The Hindu / NDTV” works. •Certifications – BEE 5-Star? BIS approved? Display badges. •Guarantees – Free returns? Warranty? Mention clearly 5. Speed & Mobile Optimization Today at least 80 percent of your traffic is mobile. If your landing page loads in 4 seconds, you’ve lost half. Aim for <2s load time. Avoid fancy animations that slow things down. Test your page on Mobile (3G/4G) and in all browsers Chrome, Safari etc 6. Minimize Distractions A landing page is not your website. •No top nav bars with 7 menu items. •No footer clutter. •No exit doors—except the CTA you want. Keep it focused. Keep them moving toward action 7. Strong CTA (Call to Action) •Make it obvious. One clear button. •Use actionable language: “Get My Free Sample,” “Book a Demo,” “Shop Now.” •Repeat CTA 2-3 times as they scroll, especially after key benefit sections. 8. A/B Test, but with caution: Gen AI makes it very easy to do so. Test •Headlines •CTA text and colors •Images vs Videos •Long-form vs Short-form copy But get the fundamentals of A/B testing right. You need statistically significant sample sizes for each test A good landing page doesn’t sell the product by itself. But It removes friction so the product has a better chance of selling And when done right, your CAC drops, your ROAS climbs, and your ads finally start working to their fullest potential

How the Humble American Diner Became the Stage for Brand Storytelling.... When we think of a diner, we think nostalgia. Neon lights, checkered floors, milkshakes, and the smell of fries drifting through the air. But today, brands aren’t just serving nostalgia, they’re serving story, theatre, and tangible brand experiences that make people stop, engage, and remember. Take Tesla’s Cybertruck “Tesla Diner & Drive-In.” It’s not just about the Superchargers. It’s about a retro-futuristic diner and drive-in theatre that transforms a functional stop into a multi-sensory moment. The diner becomes the stage where Tesla’s narrative, 'innovation meets Americana' comes alive. It’s tactile, it’s playful, and it’s a perfect example of a brand turning necessity into experience. Luxury and lifestyle brands are doing the same. CHANEL, SKIMS, and Jellycat have used pop-up diners to reinforce their brand DNA while giving consumers a physical, sensory connection. Think soft tactile displays, curated menus, neon signs echoing campaign aesthetics, and social moments built into every corner. The diner becomes a theatrical playground: consumers don’t just buy a product, they inhabit it. They sip, they snap, they share. So why does this work so well? It taps into the experience economy and Gen-Z’s appetite for moments that feel real, tangible, and shareable. A diner is both familiar and fantastical, it’s something people already know how to navigate, yet it can be transformed into a brand’s universe. Retro cues spark nostalgia, playful design encourages interaction, and the combination of taste, touch, and sight delivers multi-sensory engagement that static campaigns can’t match. They also offer collaboration potential; menus, merch, even limited-edition treats become vehicles for storytelling and co-creation. Social content writes itself: photo-booths, milkshake moments, and a drool inducing aesthetic, all make for irresistible feed fodder. And because diners are inherently communal, they naturally create micro-communities around the brand experience. For me, the power of the pop-up diner is that it’s more than just activation, it’s a physical manifesto of a brand’s values and aesthetics, inviting consumers to live the story, not just consume it. It’s theatre, tactility, and sensory engagement all rolled into one. Brands today aren’t just launching products, they’re designing worlds. So, are you still marketing products, or are you serving experiences with a side of storytelling? ________________ *Hi, I am Tim Nash. I help global brands build connected campaigns that resonate across every touchpoint. 🚀 #BrandExperience #ExperientialMarketing #RetailInnovation #GenZTrends #StorytellingInRetail #CulturalStrategy #BrandActivations #ExperienceEconomy Pictures courtesy of Glossier, Inc. / Skims / Chanel / Tesla / Benefit Cosmetics

Stop pasting interview transcripts into ChatGPT and asking for a summary. You’re not getting insights—you’re getting blabla. Here’s how to actually extract signal from qualitative data with AI. A lot of product teams are experimenting with AI for user research. But most are doing it wrong. They dump all their interviews into ChatGPT and ask: “Summarize these for me.” And what do they get back? Walls of text. Generic fluff. A lot of words that say… nothing. This is the classic trap of horizontal analysis: → “Read all 60 survey responses and give me 3 takeaways.” → Sounds smart. Looks clean. → But it washes out the nuance. Here’s a better way: Go vertical. Use AI for vertical analysis, not horizontal. What does that mean? Instead of compressing across all your data… Zoom into each individual response—deeper than you usually could afford to. One by one. Yes, really. Here’s a tactical playbook: Take each interview transcript or survey response, and feed it into AI with a structured template. Example: “Analyze this response using the following dimensions: • Sentiment (1–5) • Pain level (1–5) • Excitement about solution (1–5) • Provide 3 direct quotes that justify each score.” Now repeat for each data point. You’ll end up with a stack of structured insights you can actually compare. And best of all—those quotes let you go straight back to the raw user voice when needed. AI becomes your assistant, not your editor. The real value of AI in discovery isn’t in writing summaries. It’s in enabling depth at scale. With this vertical approach, you get: ✅ Faster analysis ✅ Clearer signals ✅ Richer context ✅ Traceable quotes back to the user You’re not guessing. You’re pattern matching across structured, consistent reads. ⸻ Are you still using AI for summaries? Try this vertical method on your next batch of interviews—and tell me how it goes. 👇 Drop your favorite prompt so we can learn from each othr.

This isn’t just a design trend. It’s a data-driven shift in how homes are created. How practical is this design? Here’s what AI is changing in residential design — backed by numbers: • AI-assisted design tools can reduce concept iteration time by 60–80% • Early-stage AI simulations cut construction change orders by up to 30% • Material optimization reduces waste by 10–20%, improving sustainability and cost control • Lighting and spatial simulations increase perceived space efficiency by up to 25% • Personalized design increases homeowner satisfaction and resale appeal — premium homes with unique architectural features often command 5–15% higher value These pebble stone stairs are a great example. AI helped: – Optimize stone size and layout for anti-slip safety – Simulate light reflection across textures at different times of day – Balance luxury aesthetics with long-term durability – Integrate the stairs seamlessly into the overall spatial flow The key insight: AI doesn’t replace architects or designers. It augments creativity with computation. Humans define taste, emotion, and vision. AI accelerates testing, optimization, and decision-making. The result.... • Better design decisions • Fewer costly mistakes • More sustainable builds • Truly personalized luxury AI is no longer just transforming software and semiconductors. It’s transforming how we design, build, and live. #AI #Architecture via @diycraftstvofficial #DesignInnovation #LuxuryDesign #SmartHomes #PropTech #FutureOfLiving #SustainableDesign

Data is everything in product design. Without data, we open ourselves up to: - Biases - Opinions - Confusion - Misalignment When we are data-informed and that data is accurate, we can truly make educated product decisions. I like to think of data in two layers: a) What’s happening and b) Why it’s happening. Let’s break it down. What’s happening: - Business data tells us how the business is doing - Marketing/sales data tells us where our customers come from - Retention data tells us when and why customers are leaving us - Engagement data tells us how customers are using our product Why it’s happening: - User research gives us rich insight into why something is happening - Voice of the customer data shows us how customers talk about our product - Usability scores show us how people perceive our product or feature experience in a measurable way - Product market fit & satisfaction scores give us a simple and actionable metric to track and improve over time In terms of accessing that data, methodologies vary, but generally speaking, I always advise the following: 1. Get access to growth and retention data through business dashboards. 2. Get access to product data through your product analytics tool. 3. Set up a cadence to gather customer reviews & comments, either manually or via automated tools. 4. Set up a cadence to speak to your users continuously to answer the why. 5. Set up a recurring survey to track satisfaction and usability. If you don’t have the data structure for any of the above, speak to your product and data team to see if you can change that. If not, rely on the data that you can actually get. PS: The list of metrics is indicative: Actual metrics will differ greatly from one company to another and largely depend on the industry, niche, as well as your data infrastructure and setup. — If you found this useful, consider reposting ♻️ How are you collecting and using data in your design process? What else are you tracking?

Building software today doesn’t look the same as 2 years ago ! Some teams write every line by hand. Some build alongside AI. Others ship products without touching code at all. What changed isn’t technology - it’s how fast ideas move from thought to product. This visual breaks down the three modern ways of building 👇 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 (𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁) This is full-control engineering. You design architectures, write logic, manage infrastructure, and integrate complex systems. It’s best when you need performance, deep customization, scalable backends, and production-grade applications - but it demands strong technical skills and longer build cycles. 𝗩𝗶𝗯𝗲-𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 (𝗔𝗜-𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁) Here, developers work with AI copilots to move faster. You still write code, but tools help generate snippets, suggest fixes, speed up debugging, and accelerate prototyping. It’s ideal for rapid iteration and smarter development workflows while keeping technical control. 𝗡𝗼-𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 (𝗩𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹 & 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺𝘀) This is building with blocks instead of syntax. Drag-and-drop tools handle logic, integrations, and workflows so non-engineers can ship MVPs, automate processes, and launch apps quickly. It trades deep customization for speed and accessibility. The real takeaway: These aren’t competing approaches, they’re complementary. Traditional coding powers complex platforms. Vibe-coding accelerates developers. No-code empowers builders. The best teams mix all three, choosing the right approach based on speed, scale, and complexity - not ideology. Build with what fits the problem. That’s how modern products ship.