Today's job descriptions are awful. They drive away top talent and waste everyone's time. Here are 8 things every great job description should include: 1. A Realistic Salary Range Sorry, but $0 - $400,000 isn’t a real range. You’re not fooling anyone with this. You’re just telling candidates that you think pay transparency isn’t something you’re serious about. 2. Location Transparency Remote means remote. Fully in office is fully in office. Saying a position is “remote” only to mention it’s hybrid or in office at the bottom doesn’t help anyone. 3. Clear, Realistic Qualifications Listing every platform, skill, and qualification imaginable in an industry isn’t realistic. Get clear on your needs and goals, research the specific skills this hire needs, and include them by name. 4. Who Will Excel in This Role Outline the ideal hire for this role, including: - Traits - Tendencies - Work Style - Cultural Fit Be specific and share examples! 5. Who Isn’t a Fit for This Role Outline who wouldn’t be a good fit for this role, including: - Expectations - Tendencies - Work Style - Cultural Fit Be specific and share examples here too. 6. Describe What Success Looks Like Describe what success will look like for this hire, including: - Tangible Goals - How Goals Are Calculated - How Goals Are Monitored - How Employees Are Supported In Reaching Goals 7. Describe the Team Culture Culture is key for both employers and employees. Describe yours including: - Work Style - Boundaries - Values - Expectations 8. Outline the Hiring Process Include a step-by-step timeline of the hiring process, including: - How many rounds - Stakeholders involved - Estimated response times Then stick to it. What did I miss?
Enhancing Job Role Clarity
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Accountability is one of the most important—and often overlooked—skills in leadership. It’s not about micromanaging or policing your team. It’s about setting people up for success. How? 🤷♀️ Through the three C's of clear expectations, challenging conversations and consistent follow-through. While we all want to believe people will naturally follow through on what they commit to, that doesn’t always happen. And when it doesn’t, too many leaders let it slide. But brushing these moments under the carpet doesn’t help anyone, all it does is erode accountability over time. So, what DO you do?? 1️⃣ Be crystal clear about expectations. Ambiguity is the enemy of accountability. If people don’t know exactly what’s expected of them, how can they deliver? Take the time to clarify actions and responsibilities WITH them, not for them. 2️⃣ Document commitments in 1:1 check-ins. Writing the actions down is REALLY important. It ensures nothing gets lost and sets a reference point for everyone involved. 3️⃣ Explain the 'why.' People are much more likely to follow through if they understand why their actions matter. How does their work contribute to the bigger picture? What’s at stake if it’s not done effectively and efficiently? 4️⃣ Anticipate and address barriers. Ask if there are any obstacles standing in the way of getting the job done. When you help remove these barriers, you’re building trust and giving people every chance to succeed. 5️⃣ Follow up at the agreed time. Don’t leave it to chance—check in when you said you would. Ideally, your team members will update you before you even have to ask. But if they don’t, don’t skip the scheduled follow-up. 6️⃣ Acknowledge effort or address gaps. If the action was completed, recognize the effort. If it wasn’t, outline the expectations for the role and provide specific feedback on what needs to improve. Be transparent about the implications of not meeting role requirements over time, ensuring the person understands both the consequences and the support available to help them succeed. (A lot of people need help to develop the skills to have this conversation!!) 7️⃣ Plan the next steps. Whether the task was completed or not, always end by agreeing on the next steps and setting clear timelines. If you need a lean/leadership coach to work on these areas and help increase accountability right across your organization, then get in touch! It's one of my specialties... 😉 _____________________________________________________ I'm Catherine- a Lean Business and Leadership Coach. I take a practical hands-on approach to helping teams and individuals achieve better results with less stress. Follow me for insights on lean, leadership and more.
-
Most recruiters are great at reviewing CVs… and terrible at writing their own. We’ve reviewed thousands of recruiter CVs. I’ll share the biggest mistake we keep seeing and how to fix it👇 Context: There are two CV tests you have to pass 1 - The scan Your CV is one of 100–300 (if you’re lucky). At this stage, the recruiter is only asking: “Is this person roughly aligned to this role?” They’re skimming for: - Keywords - Domain / market - Seniorit - Rough hiring profile match If you pass that, then comes… 2 - The read Now they actually look at your experience in detail. But most recruiters never get this far, because their CV fails ‘the scan.’ The pattern is the same: >Job title >Company name (that no one recognises) >A bunch of generic bullets: e.g. “Improved hiring efficiency by 52%” >“Implemented ATS changes” >“Aligned interview questions to company values” That might be great work. But with zero context, it’s just noise. If I don’t know what the company does or what you actually hired… I might move on. 💡3 steps on How to fix it - before any fluffy bullets, add a short “context block”. - Literally right under the job title. STEP 1 - Set the scene (company + stage) - Add 1–2 lines or bullets: - What the company does (in simple language) ‘B2B / B2C / SaaS / Marketplace / etc’ ‘Stage + rough headcount while you were there’ STEP 2 – Spell out what you actually hired Very high-level, but concrete: (Eng / Product / GTM / G&A etc) - Typical level (IC / Senior / Lead / Exec) - Rough number of hires per year / quarter STEP 3 – Name your stakeholders Show who trusted you: “Partnered with: VP Engineering, Head of Product, CFO” STEP 4 – Then add your impact bullets Now your “improved time-to-hire” or “rebuilt the ATS” actually means something, because I can see where you did it and for whom. 👀A quick example Instead of this❌ ‘Senior Talent Partner – XYZ Ltd Improved hiring efficiency by 52% Implemented new ATS workflows Ensured interview questions aligned to company values Do this ✅ : Senior Talent Partner – XYZ Ltd SaaS platform for mid-market retailers | Series B | ~180 people Roles: Product, Eng, data (IC → Lead) – ~35 hires/year - Stakeholders: VP Eng, Head of Product, CTO - Reduced average time-to-hire from 68 → 42 days - Rebuilt ATS workflows and hiring stages across 3 product squads - Introduced role scorecards and bank of behavioural questions Same person. Same work. Completely different signal. Bottom lome: Recruiters need to optimise their CVs for the scan first. If you don’t give context at the top of every role, you’re missing out.
-
How long should your onboarding program for SDRs be? I’ve now either trained or onboarded 1000+ SDRs in my career. I’ve built onboarding programs that were 1 week long, and more comprehensive programs that were 4 weeks long. Here’s what I’ve learned: 1. People don’t learn by being overloaded with documentation and videos upfront. 2. Onboarding doesn’t need to just happen in the first few weeks. Breaking down concepts in “micro lessons” over a period of time is more helpful. For example, if you sell 5 use cases, your SDRs don’t need to learn all 5 use cases in the first few weeks of onboarding. Let them master 1-2, focus on those prospects then unlock other personas. 3. People don’t retain information unless there is a continuous learning & re-enforcement loop You SHOULD set up weekly 1-1s, weekly calls reviews and power hours with reps from week 2 IMO. 4. Let SDRs learn on the job. Let them know it’s OKAY to fail. It’s okay to have some role playing up front. In fact, I recommend it. But don’t focus on this TOO heavily. They will butcher some calls and objections. Start practicing on Tier C accounts, don’t put new SDRs on the best accounts right away. With various AI sales enablement platforms like GTM Buddy, you can feed your SDRs real-time content, battlecards and learning as they are actually doing their job. It helps A LOT when it comes to actually learning and retaining information. My recommendation? Make your “official” onboarding for SDRs 1 week long. Include the following: 1. Upfront contract setting expectations for both manager and SDR 2. Day in the life of your Key Personas (Start with 1-2) 3. Main Problems you solve for 4. Basic platform functionality and how it solves problems for personas 5. How to structure your day / manage your time 6. Email / Copy Lessons 7. Cold Calling Lessons + Scripts 8. Using LinkedIn as a channel 9. Role Plays + Certifications for Email, Calls, LinkedIn 10. Overview of critical systems / tech stack Then focus on CONSTANTLY re-enforcing these. #sales #outbound
-
Hiring managers, stop blaming the talent pool - maybe your job descriptions are the real problem. How often do we hear companies struggle to find the right talent? What if the issue isn’t a lack of skilled professionals, but a lack of clarity in job descriptions? Take the Project Manager role, for example. Too often, job descriptions are filled with vague phrases like “strong communicator,” “problem solver,” or “ability to multitask,” which don’t explain what’s truly needed day-to-day. A clear job description goes beyond just listing soft skills. It should be specific about the actual tasks and responsibilities the role will involve, such as: 1. Managing 3-5 projects simultaneously, leading cross-functional teams (design, engineering, marketing) to deliver on-time with 95%+ completion rate. Creating and managing project timelines, ensuring 90% of milestones are met on schedule, with delays not exceeding 5% of the total timeline. 2. Coordinating with 5+ stakeholders and clients, managing scope changes, and achieving a 90% satisfaction rate in client feedback surveys. 3. Tracking and managing project budgets, maintaining expenses within 3-5% of the original budget, and identifying cost-saving opportunities worth 10% of the total budget. When you take the time to clearly define these tasks, you’ll attract candidates who are confident they can succeed in the role, rather than those who are simply guessing what the job entails. Clarity in job descriptions doesn’t just help you find better candidates, it saves everyone time and frustration. The more precise you are about what you need, the easier it is for both candidates and hiring managers to align. How do you ensure your job descriptions reflect what your team actually needs? Let’s discuss!
-
84% of workers are burned out by toxic workplaces. Boundaries are your best defence. In toxic work environments, setting boundaries isn’t just helpful - it’s essential for protecting your well-being. Reflecting on my first boss, I realise now that clearer boundaries could have prevented many of those situations. When we let things slide, it gives others ‘permission’ to keep testing our limits. Here are 8 common situations where boundaries can help, plus practical strategies to start setting them: 1/ After-Hours Work 🔹 When work spills into personal time, it disrupts work-life balance. ↳ Be clear about when you’re available and when you’re not. 2/ Workload Dumping 🔹 Taking on others’ tasks repeatedly leads to stress and resentment. ↳ Set boundaries on your workload while still being a team player. 3/ Last-Minute Demands 🔹 Constant last-minute requests interrupt focus and increase pressure. ↳ Request advance notice so you can manage priorities effectively. 4/ Poor Planning 🔹 When projects are rushed, quality suffers, and you end up working late. ↳ Advocate for realistic timelines to maintain quality and balance. 5/ Credit Stealing 🔹 Losing credit for your work can damage confidence and morale. ↳ Stand up for yourself and ensure your contributions are recognised. 6/ Scope Creep 🔹 Small “extras” add up quickly, costing time and resources. ↳ Clarify project boundaries to avoid overextending yourself. 7/ Vacation Interruptions 🔹 Time off is for recharging, not working. Constant interruptions defeat the purpose. ↳ Direct requests to a backup and protect your vacation time. 8/ Work-Life Boundaries 🔹 Endless work sessions lead to burnout and decreased productivity over time. ↳ Set firm limits on after-hours work to recharge fully. Setting boundaries is key to managing burnout, especially in challenging workplaces. Start using even one or two of these strategies, and you’ll see the difference in your well-being. 👇 Tell me in the comments: Which boundary has made the biggest impact for you at work? ♻️ Share with your network to help them create sustainable boundaries and prevent burnout. 🔔 Follow me, Jen Blandos, for daily tips on business, entrepreneurship, and workplace well-being.
-
𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑𝐒𝐇𝐈𝐏: 𝐂𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐀𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐅𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐓𝐞𝐚𝐦 𝐢𝐧 The Premier League In this video, Chelsea Football Club head coach Enzo Maresca welcomes Josh Achaempong and Tyrique George into Chelsea's first-team dressing room and describes his expectations of them and current first-team players in supporting these two new players. 𝑹𝒐𝒍𝒆 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒚 An important coaching lesson from this video concerns role clarity. Coach Maresca outlines what he expects from the two new players but also clearly articulates the role of existing players in welcoming them and advising them on their behaviour to maintain the existing culture with the first team. Ryska et al. (1999) stated that a key role of coaches is to help athletes understand and accept their roles within the team. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 Coach and athlete leadership is vital for developing and sustaining the culture within a team or organisation. Northouse (2016) defined leadership skills as “the ability to use one’s knowledge and competencies to accomplish a set of goals or objectives” ( p.44). Further, Northouse (2016) suggested that effective leaders require 1️⃣ conceptual skill (i.e., vision and strategic creation),2️⃣ human (i.e., people skills and the ability to create an environment of trust), and 3️⃣ technical (i.e., specialised knowledge and skills)., It is imperative that coaches communicate clear messages that can be understood by their athletes regarding how they can contribute towards team goals by utilising Northouse's (2016) conceptual mode of leadership: 1️⃣ 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹: Share the vision with the athlete regarding how you believe he or she can contribute to the team's success and the importance of his/her role within the team. 2️⃣ 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻: Build an effective relationship with the athlete so he or she will trust your training methods and the role he or she is expected to play. Also, encourage athletes to voice concerns and ask questions, boosting role clarity by eliminating confusion. 3️⃣ 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹: Create drills and training sessions that improve the players' skills in the desired areas and facilitate team success. Do the players you coach know their roles and, thus, their priorities when training and competing?
-
The fastest way to fail a massive, ambiguous project? Act like you know the answer. I see this all the time at work: a senior leader drops a vague, massive idea - the classic "future-of-X" project. The immediate reaction is panic. Teams scramble to produce a hundred-page one-pager ( 😉) defining every detail before the core idea is even solid. Why? Because we think defining the scope equals control. Here’s what I learned leading complex initiatives: You don't earn credibility by knowing the plan; you earn it by defining the right questions. Ambiguity is the universal signal that it's time to stop managing tasks and start leading thought. For years, I was the one trying to solve every vague ask solo. Now, I use a simple 5-point method to force the right conversation with senior stakeholders. This method shifts the focus from managing complexity to collapsing it down to the five critical decisions that unlock 80% of the project's path. It turns an impossible problem into five manageable, senior-level ownership points. 1️⃣ Stop Defining the Scope, Define the Exit Criteria: Agree with your principal stakeholders: what is the single, non-negotiable metric that if broken, forces the project to pause or pivot? 2️⃣ Translate the Vague into Team Trade-Offs: Never go to the team with an ambiguous question. Instead, frame the ask as concrete, strategic options. Your job is to facilitate the choice, not present the solution. 3️⃣ Find the Sacred Cow: Every ambiguous project is built on one risky assumption. Find it. Challenge it. Publicly. 4️⃣ Audit the Information Gaps (Not People): Do not ask, "Who owns this piece?" Ask, "Who has the data (or context) we need to move forward?" Then, make the introduction. 5️⃣ Secure One 'Yes': Your first goal isn't securing the whole budget. It's getting a key sponsor to agree to the next single question you must answer. This creates momentum without over-promising. This is the scaffolding that elevates your role from excellent operator to strategic leader. It shows you're not just executing the plan, you're architecting the path. – I share actionable frameworks and real-world stories for tech leaders. 👉 Follow me, Rony Rozen, to get them in your feed.
-
Stop justifying your boundaries. “No” is not rude. It’s how you protect your time, energy, and sanity. I used to be available for everything: 6 PM “quick fixes” that turned into 90-minute tasks. Weekend messages that killed any chance of rest Not because I didn’t have boundaries, But because I didn’t know how to communicate them. Here are 12 boundary-setting phrases I wish I had used sooner: 10 Phrases That Say “I’m not available for that” - without burning bridges: "That doesn’t work for me—here’s what does." → Assertive, clear, and solution-focused. "I’m offline after 6 PM. Let’s revisit this in the morning." → You set the availability, not your inbox. "Let me check my schedule and get back to you." → Creates space to decide without pressure. "I’m happy to help. What should I deprioritize to take this on?" → Makes the tradeoff visible. "I’ve blocked 30 minutes for this call." → Time-caps your energy before others overrun it. "I can help with this part, but not the whole thing." → Protects your bandwidth while still being useful. "Let’s schedule this properly—I want to give it the attention it deserves." → Turn chaos into structure. "I’ve learned I don’t do well with last-minute requests." → Share the why without over-explaining. "Let me get back to you by [time] after I think it through." → You’re not obligated to answer instantly. "That’s outside my zone—but here’s someone who might be a better fit." → Say no, and still be a connector. You don’t need to be aggressive to be clear. You don’t need to explain your “no” to make it valid. Boundaries are a business skill. Use them like one. Save this. Read it again the next time someone tries to rush your yes.
-
I just watched an AE lose a $1.2M deal after running a "successful" product trial that the prospect LOVED. After 8 weeks of work, the CFO killed it with five words: "Let's try our current vendor." This happens because most reps treat trials as product demos instead of what they actually are: RISK ELIMINATION EXERCISES. After analyzing 200+ enterprise sales cycles at companies like Salesforce, HubSpot, Thomson Reuters, and Workday, I've identified the exact framework that separates 80%+ trial conversion rates from the industry average of 30%. Here's what most reps get wrong: They skip qualification and jump straight into the trial. Big mistake. Before any trial, ask these 3 questions: → "What happens if you don't solve this problem in the next 90 days?" → "How have you tried solving this before?" → "Who else is affected by this problem?" These eliminate 68% of unqualified trials before they start. Next, define success upfront: → Technical requirements that must work → Business metrics they expect to see → Timeline for implementation → User adoption patterns needed Get confirmation: "Just to confirm, if we demonstrate these criteria, you'd be ready to move forward with purchase by [date]. Correct?" Map every stakeholder: → Technical buyers (include every trial user) → Economic buyers (CFO/budget holder) → Political influencers (who can kill deals) → Current solution advocates (who benefits from status quo) For each person, document their personal win/loss scenarios. Have legal review agreements BEFORE starting trials. "We typically have legal review the agreement structure ahead of time so there are no surprises later. Would you be open to having them review a blank agreement while the trial is running?" Finally, handle the current vendor objection upfront: → "Have you discussed these challenges with your current vendor?" → "What was their response?" → "What specific capabilities do they lack?" Document these answers to build your business case. Results from this approach: ✅ Trial conversion: 32% to 83% in 60 days ✅ Deal size increased 40% ✅ Sales cycle shortened 37% ✅ Forecast accuracy improved 92% ✅ 43% less time on unsuccessful trials Stop running trials. Start running risk elimination exercises. — Sales Leaders! Your reps don’t need another training. They need a Revenue OS™. Check this out: https://lnkd.in/ghh8VCaf
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development