Steps to Develop a NextGen Audit Program

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Developing a NextGen audit program means creating an audit process that uses modern tools like artificial intelligence and risk-based methods to improve accuracy, save time, and help organizations stay ahead of compliance requirements. These programs move away from manual, once-a-year audits and rely on continuous monitoring and smarter workflows to catch issues early and keep businesses secure.

  • Embrace automation: Connect your data sources and set up automated evidence collection and reporting to minimize manual work and maintain up-to-date compliance records.
  • Prioritize risk assessment: Identify and focus on high-risk areas by regularly analyzing business objectives, risk trends, and past audit findings to build a dynamic, adaptable audit plan.
  • Build structured workflows: Establish repeatable steps for preparation, fieldwork, and reporting so your audit program consistently delivers trustworthy results and adds value to your organization.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Inga S.

    Cybersecurity & Risk Leader | 15+ Years Driving Security, Compliance, Risk Management & Board-Level Strategy | From Findings to Fixes, I Deliver Security That Performs

    29,243 followers

    67% of security teams still run compliance audits manually in 2026. That is not a resource problem. That is a $2.1M mistake waiting to happen. AI reduces audit prep time by 40 to 60%. Yet most compliance teams only touch it during audit season. Then wonder why they are always scrambling. Here is the full masterclass on using AI for compliance the right way. 3 modes. Most teams only know one. Assist Ask questions. Draft policies. Find gaps faster. This is where most teams stop. It is also the least powerful mode. Automate AI reads your documents, maps controls, flags gaps, and creates audit-ready reports automatically. No manual pulling. No last-minute panic. Orchestrate This is where compliance becomes operational. Run tasks automatically. Collect evidence. Score risks. Generate reports on schedule. Your compliance posture is always visible. Always current. The 5-step workflow no one talks about: Step 1 : Start with gap analysis Upload your policies and security controls. Ask AI to map them against your target framework. Get a prioritized gap list in minutes, not weeks. Step 2 : Connect your evidence sources Link Jira, ServiceNow, AWS Config, Azure Policy, Google Workspace. AI pulls evidence automatically and tags it to the right control. Step 3 : Build custom compliance skills Run an audit workflow once manually. Then tell AI to package it into a reusable template. It captures the steps, evidence sources, and reporting format automatically. Step 4 : Automate reporting Schedule daily risk scores, weekly control coverage reports, and monthly board-ready summaries. No manual updates. No version confusion. Step 5 : Move to continuous compliance Framework coverage tracked live in the background. No more point-in-time audits. No more last-minute scrambles before an assessor walks in. The 3 mistakes killing compliance programs: Mistake 1 : Using AI only at audit time AI used only during audit season is a last-minute patch. Embed it in your daily workflow. Continuous compliance beats reactive compliance every time. Mistake 2 : No framework context or memory AI gets smarter when you tell it your frameworks, risk appetite, and compliance history. Set your instructions once. It works with that context in every session. Mistake 3 : Not connecting your evidence sources AI without your actual data is just a policy writer. Connect your cloud environments, ITSM tools, and asset management systems. That is where the real compliance power starts. The teams winning in 2026 are not working harder. They built a system that works while they sleep. Continuous monitoring. Automated reporting. Live framework coverage. The audit does not surprise them. They are always ready. Compliance is not a once-a-year event. It is an always-on operation. Which of the 3 mistakes is your team still making? ♻️ Save this and repost it for your compliance team.

  • View profile for Tom McLeod

    Intersection of AI and Internal Audit Global Adviser to Boards & Chief Audit Executives International Speaker | Author

    35,734 followers

    Isn’t AI Just Data Analytics? At a professionals networking meeting a while ago I overheard someone boasting that they were a world leader with AI in Internal Audit because “AI is just data analytics and I have been doing data analytics for decades”. The keen listener agreed with the keener boaster and they then changed their conversation as to how they would improve the US political environment!! The self assured gentleman’s vision of AI set a spark in me – not a good one rather an out of control wildfire type one which come to think of it may be a good one! – to refute his worldview if only for my education. So over the last couple of weeks I have been jotting down randomly my retort in the way of newly conceived LLM prompts that Internal Audit could use that would take us past the world of data analytics (which I don’t dispute by the way is necessary but go and chat with Excel for that!) into a whole new paradigm of insight. ~ AUDIT PLANNING & RISK FORESIGHT ~ 1 - Analyse our last 5 years of audit reports and recommend high-risk areas we’ve under-covered. 2 - Predict risk escalation trends based on our past incidents and audit findings. 3 - Cross-reference our audit plan against Fortune 500 class actions in the last 3 years. Where do we under-invest? 4 - Build a dynamic audit plan that shifts weekly based on real-time internal data and industry disruption velocity. 5 - Cross-check executive incentive plans with risk culture metrics - where are we rewarding latent risk-taking? 6 - Correlate risk incidents with leadership turnover, culture surveys, and reorg activity - map the leadership fragility zone. ~ SCOPING & PROGRAM DESIGN ~ 7 - Simulate a walkthrough of the X process and flag likely control gaps. 8 - Build a zero-trust audit scope - assume every control is flawed. 9 - Reverse engineer our last 10 audit reports - what are we not saying that we should be? ~ FIELDWORK, TESTING & OBSERVATION ~ 10 - Compare this interview transcript with the control design - are there discrepancies? 11 - Test for AI-generated documents disguised as genuine - what authentication failures are we blind to? 12 - Design a continuous assurance program where AI performs micro-audits every hour across core processes. ~ INSIGHT SYNTHESIS & REPORTING ~ 13 - Summarise root causes from last 5 years of audit reports - cluster by theme. 14 - Model the likely risk trajectory if management does not implement recommendations. ~ STRATEGIC ADVISORY ~ 15 - Act as a digital twin of the Chief Audit Executive - critique our current audit strategy. 16 - Simulate the unintended consequences if our top 5 audit recommendations are fully implemented. 17 - Build a dashboard that shows how fast assurance turns into action—what is our audit conversion rate? 18 - Develop a ‘resistance map’—which teams are most likely to game, delay, or impede audit findings?

  • View profile for Mohamed Ghoniem

    Assurance Partner

    4,945 followers

    Enhancing Internal Audit Programs through Risk-Based Auditing: A Strategic Approach Integrating Risk-Based Auditing (RBA) into internal audit programs enhances effectiveness and efficiency. Learn how to achieve this strategic approach: Understanding Risk-Based Auditing - Risk-Based Auditing (RBA) identifies and assesses key risks to an organization's objectives, allocating resources to high-risk areas for more relevant and timely insights. Key Steps to Integrate RBA - 1. Understand the Organization: Understand the organization's objectives, strategies, and risk landscape by reviewing key documents and consulting with stakeholders to identify critical risk areas. 2. Risk Assessment: Conduct a thorough risk assessment to identify and prioritize risks using tools like risk matrices and heat maps, forming the foundation of the RBA approach. 3. Develop the Audit Plan: Develop a dynamic risk-based audit plan that aligns with the organization's risk profile, allowing for adjustments as risks evolve. 4. Allocate Resources: Allocate audit resources based on risk assessment, prioritizing high-risk areas and adjusting resource allocation accordingly. 5. Coordinate with Other Assurance Providers: Collaborate with other assurance providers to avoid duplication and ensure comprehensive risk coverage. 6. Communicate the Plan: Communicate the risk-based audit plan to stakeholders to gain support and understanding of audit focus and priorities. 7. Continuous Monitoring and Updating: Regularly review and update the risk-based audit plan to reflect changes in the organization's risk environment and ensure ongoing effectiveness. Benefits of Risk-Based Auditing - i. Enhanced Focus: RBA focuses on high-risk areas, addressing critical issues and leading to more impactful audit outcomes. ii. Proactive Risk Management: RBA promotes a proactive approach to risk management, helping organizations to anticipate and mitigate risks before they materialize. iii. Improved Resource Allocation: Efficient use of audit resources by focusing on areas that matter the most, thereby increasing the overall efficiency of the audit process. iv. Better Stakeholder Communication: Clear communication of the audit plan and its focus areas enhances transparency and builds trust with stakeholders. Conclusion - Integrating Risk-Based Auditing into internal audit programs is not just a best practice but a necessity in today’s dynamic business environment. It enables organizations to stay ahead of potential risks, ensuring robust risk management and sustained success.

  • View profile for Mohamed Ahmed Sabri CISA, CISM, CRISC, CGEIT, PMP, CIA, CFE, CGAP,CRMA

    IIA Mentor | CIA Exam Instructor | IIA Global Internal Audit Standards (GIAS 2025) Trainer | Professional Certification Trainer | Internal Audit & Governance Professional | Consulting |

    18,066 followers

    👉 🧭 Fieldwork Is Not Testing, It’s Structured Assurance A strong audit engagement is often won or lost before the first sample is tested. One of the most common mistakes in internal audit is jumping directly into testing without a structured fieldwork flow. A more effective internal audit fieldwork approach follows this sequence: 🧭 PREPARATION PHASE 1️⃣ Understand the Process & Risks Review process flow, objectives, systems, stakeholders, and risk universe. 2️⃣ Define Audit Objectives & Scope Clarify what is in scope, what is not, and what assurance is expected. 3️⃣ Conduct Preliminary Risk Assessment Identify key risk areas, control points, and exposure scenarios. 4️⃣ Build the Risk & Control Matrix (RCM) Map risks, controls, owners, control types, and objectives, this becomes the backbone of the audit. 5️⃣ Develop the Audit Program Translate the RCM into detailed procedures, testing steps, sampling, and evidence requirements. 🔍 EXECUTION PHASE 6️⃣ Walkthroughs & Process Validation Confirm whether documented processes match actual operations. 7️⃣ Test Control Design Effectiveness Assess whether controls are properly designed to mitigate identified risks. 8️⃣ Test Operating Effectiveness Verify whether controls are consistently performed in practice. 9️⃣ Perform Substantive & Analytical Procedures Use data analysis, reconciliations, trend reviews, and exception testing where needed. 📊 CONCLUSION PHASE 🔟 Evaluate Root Causes & Impact Determine whether issues stem from design gaps, execution failures, governance weaknesses, or system limitations. 1️⃣1️⃣ Discuss Observations with Management Validate facts early and ensure alignment before final reporting. 1️⃣2️⃣ Validate Findings & Evidence Sufficiency Ensure conclusions are supported, relevant, and properly evidenced. 1️⃣3️⃣ Finalize Conclusions & Reporting Link findings to risk exposure, business impact, and overall assurance opinion. 🧠 Final Thought Internal audit fieldwork is not about executing procedures randomly. It is about moving in a controlled flow: Risk → Control → Design → Testing → Evidence → Conclusion That discipline is what separates structured assurance from checklist auditing. #InternalAudit #AuditFieldwork #RiskManagement #InternalControls #AuditQuality #GovernanceRiskCompliance #RCM #AuditProcess #DataAnalytics #ProfessionalSkepticism

  • View profile for karim Mohamed

    Internal Audit & GRC Leader| Healthcare | Audit Strategy | ERM | Governance | Multi-Entity Operations | compliance | Risk & controls | Revenue Optimization | Risk-Based Audits | Data Analytics | CIA | GCC & Egypt

    6,978 followers

    1. Risk Assessment & Audit Planning Start with identifying high-risk areas and aligning audit priorities with business objectives. Develop the audit plan based on company strategy and compliance needs. 2. Audit Engagement Preparation Define the scope, objectives, and timeline of the audit. Notify departments in advance and prepare the audit team with relevant background information. 3. Opening Meeting Meet with department heads and stakeholders to communicate the purpose, scope, and expected outcomes. Build cooperation and transparency from the start. 4. Fieldwork & Evidence Collection Conduct interviews, review documentation, and test internal controls. Gather sufficient, reliable, and relevant evidence through observations and data analysis. 5. Documentation of Findings Record issues, control weaknesses, and process gaps. Support every finding with objective evidence. Maintain audit working papers for accountability. 6. Analysis & Root Cause Evaluation Don’t stop at symptoms—identify the underlying causes of issues. Understand why controls failed or were bypassed to propose effective solutions. 7. Audit Report Drafting Write a clear, concise, and actionable report. Include findings, impact assessments, risk ratings, and practical recommendations tailored to the business. 8. Closing Meeting & Stakeholder Feedback Present the draft report to stakeholders. Discuss findings, clarify misunderstandings, and incorporate valid feedback before finalizing the report. 9. Follow-Up & Monitoring Track the implementation of corrective actions. Conduct follow-up reviews to ensure issues are resolved and improvements are sustained over time. 🔁 Internal audit is not just about control—it's about adding value, improving processes, and enabling risk-informed decisions.

  • View profile for Amir El-Sasy CIA, CRBA, IRCA, CFSA, CFE, GRCP.

    Chief Audit Executive | Chief Governance, Risk & Compliance Officer | Managment Consultant | B.O.D Consultant | Ethics Committee Non-Executive

    1,966 followers

    🔍 Internal Audit Risk Assessment: The Foundation of an Effective Audit Plan An Internal Audit function should never operate on assumptions or routine-based checklists. The real value of Internal Audit begins with a structured risk assessment — identifying where the organization is most exposed and focusing assurance efforts where they matter most. So, what are the key steps in conducting an effective Internal Audit Risk Assessment? 1️⃣ Understand the Organization’s Objectives Start with the big picture, Review the company’s strategic objectives, operational priorities, and key business initiatives. Because if you don’t understand what the organization is trying to achieve, you cannot identify what could prevent it from getting there. 2️⃣ Identify the Audit Universe Map all auditable entities, such as: ✔️ Business units ✔️ Processes ✔️ Systems ✔️ Projects ✔️ Regulatory areas This becomes the full scope of potential audit coverage. 3️⃣ Identify Key Risks Assess risks across each auditable area, including: • Financial risks • Operational risks • Compliance risks • Strategic risks • Technology / Cyber risks • Reputational risks Ask: “What could go wrong, and what would be the impact?” 4️⃣ Gather Stakeholder Input Engage with: 🔹 Senior Management 🔹 Process Owners 🔹 Risk Management 🔹 Compliance 🔹 Board / Audit Committee Risk assessment is strongest when it reflects multiple perspectives. 5️⃣ Evaluate Risk Factors Assess each risk using criteria such as: 📌 Likelihood 📌 Impact 📌 Control maturity 📌 Regulatory exposure 📌 Change velocity 📌 Fraud susceptibility This creates consistency and objectivity. 6️⃣ Score and Prioritize Risks Apply a risk scoring methodology to rank auditable areas. High-risk + high-impact areas should naturally move to the top of the audit plan. 7️⃣ Consider Existing Assurance Coverage Avoid duplication. Review assurance already provided by: • Compliance reviews • External audit • Risk management monitoring • Regulatory inspections This supports integrated assurance. 8️⃣ Develop the Risk-Based Audit Plan Translate results into an annual / multi-year audit plan aligned to organizational priorities. The audit plan should be dynamic, not static. 9️⃣ Review and Refresh Regularly Risk is constantly evolving. Emerging risks, regulatory shifts, cyber threats, and market disruptions require periodic reassessment. A strong Internal Audit Risk Assessment ensures we stop auditing based on habit… …and start auditing based on what matters most. ♻️ Repost to help your network shift from "check-the-box" to "risk-informed" auditing. ➕ Follow me for more on internal audit, ERM, and corporate governance. #InternalAudit #RiskAssessment #AuditPlanning #RiskBasedAuditing #Governance #AuditLeadership #GRC #CorporateGovernance #IIA #Audit #OCEG #Risk #InternalControls #AuditStrategy

  • View profile for Syed Azeem Amer

    Senior Internal Audit Professional | 11+ Years in Risk-Based Auditing, Governance & Internal Controls | MBA (Finance) | Member – (IIA) | CIA Candidate | SAP S/4HANA | Retail | Healthcare | Manufacturing | Construction

    32,432 followers

    Building an Internal Audit Function from Scratch Establishing an Internal Audit (IA) function where none existed is both a challenge and an opportunity. Reporting directly to the CEO without an Audit Committee (AC) means you are laying the foundation for governance, risk management, and internal controls. 1. Understand the Organization Start by learning the business strategy, key processes, and stakeholder expectations. Without this context, controls and audit plans risk being misaligned. 2. Assess Risks & Controls Identify strategic, operational, compliance, and financial risks through interviews, walkthroughs, and reviews of policies and KPIs. This provides a clear picture of vulnerabilities and gaps. 3. Develop a Risk-Based Internal Audit (RBIA) Plan Prioritize areas with the highest risk and break processes into auditable sub-processes (e.g., procurement → vendor onboarding → payments). Keep the RBIA dynamic, updating it as the business evolves. 4. Define the Audit Charter & Structure Formalize IA’s mandate, scope, and independence. Create clear reporting and escalation lines to ensure transparency in the absence of an AC. 5. Build Trust & Credibility Start with quick wins that deliver immediate value. Communicate openly and constructively. Collaborate with process owners to co-create solutions. Continuously adapt to feedback and business needs. Final Thoughts Launching IA from the ground up requires vision, influence, and strong technical expertise. By aligning with organizational goals and delivering value early on, IA can become a trusted partner and a key pillar of governance. Have you ever been part of building an internal audit function from scratch? What lessons did you learn along the way? #InternalAudit #RiskManagement #Governance #RBIA #Leadership

  • View profile for Dhilleswara Rao Neelapu

    Recertification Audits, Surveillance Audits, Project Internal and External Audits (ISO - 9001), Project Quality Management, Quality Assurance & Control - Process Improvement

    1,891 followers

    Making quality audits successful requires proper planning, execution, communication, and follow-up. A successful audit is not just about finding nonconformities but about adding value, improving processes, and building trust. Here’s a structured approach: --- 🔹 1. Pre-Audit Preparation Define Objectives: Clarify whether the audit is for compliance, improvement, certification, or risk reduction. Plan the Audit: Create an audit plan with scope, criteria, schedule, and areas to be covered. Know the Standards: Be well-versed in ISO standards, organizational procedures, and customer requirements. Select Competent Auditors: Ensure auditors are trained, objective, and independent from the process being audited. Communicate in Advance: Share audit schedules and expectations with auditees to reduce resistance and anxiety. --- 🔹 2. Audit Execution Start with Opening Meeting: Explain the purpose, scope, methodology, and expected outcome. Use Evidence-Based Approach: Verify compliance through records, observations, and interviews rather than assumptions. Ask Open-Ended Questions: Encourage discussion instead of “yes/no” answers. Observe Processes in Action: Don’t just check documents—see how the process is actually performed. Maintain Professionalism: Be objective, respectful, and supportive, not fault-finding. --- 🔹 3. Reporting Highlight Strengths as well as Gaps: Recognize good practices along with nonconformities. Be Clear and Specific: Report findings with evidence, not opinions. Classify Issues: Separate major, minor nonconformities, and opportunities for improvement. Provide Actionable Recommendations: Suggest practical improvements aligned with business goals. --- 🔹 4. Post-Audit Follow-up Closing Meeting: Present findings openly, answer questions, and agree on next steps. Corrective Action Tracking: Ensure issues are addressed with root cause analysis, corrective actions, and timelines. Verify Effectiveness: Re-check whether corrective actions solved the problem, not just closed the paperwork. Continuous Improvement: Use audit results as input for management reviews and strategic planning. --- 🔹 5. Best Practices for Successful Quality Audits ✅ Treat audits as a value-adding activity rather than fault-finding. ✅ Build a collaborative relationship between auditors and auditees. ✅ Use risk-based thinking—focus more on critical processes. ✅ Apply technology (audit software, digital checklists, data analytics) for efficiency. ✅ Promote a culture of quality where employees see audits as learning, not punishment.

  • View profile for Jeff Shiver CMRP

    Helping Plant Leaders Transform by Eliminating Reactive Maintenance | Founder, Speaker, Author | CMRP | Asset Management & RCM2 RCM3 Reliability Practitioner

    10,519 followers

    I keep asking plant directors why their reliability programs fail. The answer is rarely the plan. It's almost always something earlier in the sequence. Nobody ran a real assessment. The why never made it onto a wall where the team could see it. Or somebody asked technicians to redesign the maintenance strategy before training them on what a good one looks like. The work isn't what kills these programs. The order is. Here are the 6 steps I share with every leadership team I sit down with. 1. Assess the Gaps. Run a formal reliability assessment, not a maintenance audit. Maintenance only controls a small portion of reliability. Operations, engineering, procurement all touch it. The assessment surfaces where things are actually breaking down. 2. Build the Plan. Treat the rollout like an engineering project. Real budget. Real timing. Three to five years to move out of reactive and stay there. 3. Win the Executives. Speak in dollars. Cost avoidance is part of it, but maintenance can also be a profit center when capacity, quality, and asset life improve. Build the business case before you walk into that room. 4. Educate First. Two halves. Start with the why. Most people aren't resisting change. They're resisting being changed. Then teach the work. Most plants have never offered formal training on planning, RCA, or RCM. Don't ask your team to redesign a strategy nobody trained them to understand. 5. Document the Process. Tribal knowledge walks out the front door when people retire. Define the processes. Validate them. Audit weekly at first, tapering to monthly. Audits are for processes, not people. Then empower the team closest to the equipment to drive continuous improvement. 6. Celebrate the Wins. A thank you. A fist bump. They sound small. They are not. They are how you convert the wait-and-see crowd into the buy-in crowd. The biggest variable in any of this is the people. Light the fire at the lowest levels of the plant, fuel it with the why and the training and the recognition, and the program will anchor itself even through the next reorganization. Which step do you see plants skip most often? If you like this and want to hear more, signup to my newsletter. Link in comments.

Explore categories