Innovation

We trained a humanoid with 22-DoF dexterous hands to assemble model cars, operate syringes, sort poker cards, fold/roll shirts, all learned primarily from 20,000+ hours of egocentric human video with no robot in the loop. Humans are the most scalable embodiment on the planet. We discovered a near-perfect log-linear scaling law (R² = 0.998) between human video volume and action prediction loss, and this loss directly predicts real-robot success rate. Humanoid robots will be the end game, because they are the practical form factor with minimal embodiment gap from humans. Call it the Bitter Lesson of robot hardware: the kinematic similarity lets us simply retarget human finger motion onto dexterous robot hand joints. No learned embeddings, no fancy transfer algorithms needed. Relative wrist motion + retargeted 22-DoF finger actions serve as a unified action space that carries through from pre-training to robot execution. Our recipe is called "EgoScale": - Pre-train GR00T N1.5 on 20K hours of human video, mid-train with only 4 hours (!) of robot play data with Sharpa hands. 54% gains over training from scratch across 5 highly dexterous tasks. - Most surprising result: a *single* teleop demo is sufficient to learn a never-before-seen task. Our recipe enables extreme data efficiency. - Although we pre-train in 22-DoF hand joint space, the policy transfers to a Unitree G1 with 7-DoF tri-finger hands. 30%+ gains over training on G1 data alone. The scalable path to robot dexterity was never more robots. It was always us. - Website: https://lnkd.in/gxzgeP-2 - Paper: https://lnkd.in/g7PJdz_8

🗑️ This might look like an ordinary street corner — but it’s one of the smartest waste systems in the world. I find this fascinating, across the Netherlands, cities are quietly reinventing waste management. Trash bins are hidden underground, storing waste several meters below the surface. When full, trucks with hydraulic cranes lift, empty, and replace them — seamlessly, with no noise, no clutter, and no odor. Why it works so well: 🗑️ Holds up to 5× more waste than traditional bins 🐀 Prevents pests and bad smells 🌿 Fewer collections = lower emissions 🏙️ Frees up valuable urban space 🔇 Quieter, cleaner neighborhoods I love how this innovation blends engineering, design, and sustainability — solving big problems so elegantly that you barely notice it. Smart design doesn’t need to be loud to change the world. Could this be the model for the next generation of smart, livable cities? #AI #Innovation #Technology #Sustainability #SmartCities #Engineering #UrbanPlanning #CleanTech #Design #FutureOfWork

Today in Cell, we published new research showing how AI can help accelerate cancer discovery. With GigaTIME, we can now simulate spatial proteomics from routine pathology slides, enabling population-scale analysis of tumor microenvironments across dozens of cancer types and hundreds of subtypes.   Developed in partnership with Providence and the University of Washington, our hope is that this work helps scientists move faster from data to insight, revealing new links between genetic mutations, immune activity, and clinical outcomes, and ultimately improving health for people everywhere. https://lnkd.in/dSpPdtzz

Grid bottlenecks are a feature — not a bug — of the energy transition. For years, we viewed economics as the main hurdle to scaling clean energy. High costs for wind, solar, heat pumps, and storage dominated the conversation. But the world has changed. Thanks to extraordinary innovation and dramatic cost reductions in renewables and electrification technologies, the bottlenecks we face today are different. They’re no longer about whether clean energy is affordable — it is. Instead, the challenge is whether our energy systems can evolve quickly enough to integrate it. A recent Financial Times piece highlights this clearly: across Europe, the rapid build-out of renewable generation now outpaces the ability of grids to move electricity to where it’s needed. Curtailment, congestion, and long queues for grid connections already cost billions annually — and without decisive action, these costs will grow. This isn’t a sign of failure. It’s a sign of success. It means the transition is happening faster than the infrastructure built for the fossil era can handle. The rise of decentralised, variable renewables and electrified heating and transport requires a fundamentally different approach to planning — one that anticipates growth rather than reacts to it. The EU’s move toward more coordinated, top-down scenario building and cross-border grid planning recognises exactly this. Better alignment between countries and system operators, faster permitting, and prioritisation of critical projects are essential steps to unlock the full value of cheap clean energy. Because every euro lost to bottlenecks is not a cost of climate action — it’s a cost of not modernising our grids fast enough. The more successful we are in deploying renewables and electrification, the more urgently we must upgrade and expand our grids. Grid constraints are not a reason to slow down. They’re a reason to speed up the transformation of an energy system that was never designed for the technologies now powering our transition.

Designed as the lightest single-person flying vehicle, this air scooter represents a major shift in how we think about urban transport and personal movement. Would you use it? 📊 Why this matters: Reaches speeds of up to 100 km/h in open conditions Operates at low altitude with advanced stabilization systems Requires minimal take-off space compared to helicopters or eVTOLs Designed for single-rider efficiency and rapid point-to-point travel Potential use cases: emergency response, remote access, security patrol, and premium urban mobility 🌍 With cities projected to house 68% of the world’s population by 2050 (UN), vertical mobility is moving from concept to necessity. Ground congestion already costs major economies 2–3% of GDP annually due to lost productivity and delays. This isn’t just a new vehicle. It’s a signal that transport is shifting from roads to air corridors. The future of mobility is no longer horizontal. It’s vertical. via @supercarblondie #FutureOfTransport #UrbanMobility #AerialInnovation #SmartCities #MobilityTech #DisruptiveInnovation #Zapata #VerticalTransport #NextGenMobility

WIPO’s global report on IP filings is out and records are being broken. 2024 saw the highest ever patent filings – 3.7 million worldwide. Design filings also peaked at a record 1.6 mln, while trademark filings stabilized after two years of decline. But within this rich trove of data from nearly 150 IP offices, a few deeper insights stand out. First, emerging and developing countries continue to embrace IP-driven growth and transformation, whether driven by the need to diversify engines of growth, support increasing aspirations of local innovators and entrepreneurs, create more attractive investment environments, or simply seek new sources of growth. For the sixth consecutive year, India posts double-digit growth in patent filings, with Türkiye also up some 15%. Among the top 20 countries of origin, 12 saw increases in trademark filings, led by Argentina, Brazil and Indonesia, and with strong growth in upper middle-income economies like Colombia, South Africa, Thailand and Viet Nam. Design filings tell a similar story, with the fastest growth in India, Morocco and Indonesia. What this means is that many emerging economies are following the path of the world’s established innovation powerhouses in using IP as a strategic lever for economic growth, diversification, development and resilience. The next challenge is commercializing more of these filings, so they become real-world products and services. Second, we’re seeing more domestic, or “resident” filings. In areas like trademarks and designs, resident filings have traditionally made up the vast majority (+70%) as local businesses often register IP to protect brands and designs serving domestic markets. Now, we’re seeing the same dynamics in patents. Resident patent filings grew almost 7% last year, the fastest rise since 2016, to 72% of the total. This growth in domestic filings suggests that innovation ecosystems are maturing (even for high-tech discoveries, inventors typically file at home first before expanding abroad). It may also reflect shifts in global trade flows, with some industries becoming more localized. Third, many of the major trends in recent years continue to accelerate. Just as AI and digital innovation dominate the headlines, computer technology remains the top field for patent activity, with its growth outpacing all others. The gender balance in innovation is also improving. The proportion of women inventors in international patent applications has increased from 11.6% in 2010 to 18% last year. Beyond the individual data points, the value of this report lies in what it reveals about the global state of innovation and the direction it’s heading. This year’s WIPI shows that people everywhere continue to believe in the power of IP to protect ideas and incentivize innovation, and it gives WIPO the energy to continue strengthening IP ecosystems everywhere to give these innovators and creators the tools to protect and commercialize their ideas. 🔗 https://ow.ly/gub150XqnE7

🚨 Introducing the AI Apps 50: Startup Edition Ever wondered how startups are spending their money when it comes to AI? Our team at Andreessen Horowitz worked with Mercury to crunch the numbers and rank the top applications by spend. The list + what we learned from it ⬇️ - Horizontal apps have a slight lead over vertical (60% of the list). This includes general assistants (ex. Perplexity) and SIX different meeting support tools (ex. Fyxer AI). But, it also encompasses creative tools and vibe coding tools that are used in roles across orgs. - Vertical apps can augment human labor...or replace it. We're mostly seeing the former - but five companies on the list allow customers to "hire AI" (ex. Crosby Legal, Cognition, 11x). Labor augmenters mostly assist with customer service, sales, and recruiting. - Vibe coding has landed in enterprises. It's not just a prosumer trend! Number three on the list, below OpenAI and Anthropic? Replit. Other listmakers in the category include Lovable and Emergent, while Cursor made the ranks for more technical users. - Products are making the consumer -> enterprise jump. 12 cos also appeared in our most recent Consumer AI Top 100 - almost all of which started out B2C and have migrated B2B over time. In fact, 70% of listmakers are available for individual use (no enterprise license needed)! Check out the full report: https://lnkd.in/gmMvfvSv

🔮 UX Metrics and KPIs Cheatsheet (Figma) (https://lnkd.in/en9MK4MD), a helpful reference sheet for UX metrics, with formulas and examples — for brand score, desirability, loyalty, satisfaction, sentiment, success, usefulness and many others. Neatly put together in one single place by fine folks at Helio Glare. To me personally, measuring UX success is focused around just a few key attributes — how successful users are in completing their key tasks, how many errors users experience along the way and how quickly users get through onboarding to first meaningful success. The context of the project will of course request specific, custom metrics — e.g. search quality score, or brand score, or engagement score or loyalty — but UX metrics are all around delivering value to users through their successes. Here are some examples: 1. Top tasks success > 80% (for critical tasks) 2. Time to complete top tasks < Xs (for critical tasks) 3. Time to first success < 90s (for onboarding) 4. Time to candidates < 120s (nav + filtering in eCommerce) 5. Time to top candidate < 120s (for feature comparison) 6. Time to hit the limit of a free tier < 7d (for upgrades) 7. Presets/templates usage > 80% per user (to boost efficiency) 8. Filters used per session > 5 per user (quality of filtering) 9. Feature adoption rate > 30% (usage of a new feature per user) 10. Feature retention rate > 40% (after 90 days) 11. Time to pricing quote < 2 weeks (for B2B systems) 12. Application processing time < 2 weeks (online banking) 13. Default settings correction < 10% (quality of defaults) 14. Relevance of top 100 search queries > 80% (for top 5 results) 15. Service desk inquiries < 35/week (poor design → more inquiries) 16. Form input accuracy ≈ 100% (user input in forms) 17. Frequency of errors < 3/visit (mistaps, double-clicks) 18. Password recovery frequency < 5% per user (for auth) 19. Fake email addresses < 5% (newsletters) 20. Helpdesk follow-up rate < 4% (quality of service desk replies) 21. “Turn-around” score < 1 week (frustrated users -> happy users) 22. Environmental impact < 0.3g/page request (sustainability) 23. Frustration score < 10% (AUS + SUS/SUPR-Q) 24. System Usability Scale > 75 (usability) 25. Accessible Usability Scale (AUS) > 75 (accessibility) Each team works with 3–4 design KPIs that reflect the impact of their work. Search team works with search quality score, onboarding team works with time to success, authentication team works with password recovery rate. What gets measured, gets better. And it gives you the data you need to monitor and visualize the impact of your design work. Once it becomes a second nature of your process, not only will you have an easier time for getting buy-in, but also build enough trust to boost UX in a company with low UX maturity. [continues in comments ↓] #ux #design

Meta just hit Command + Zuck on its AI strategy - shredding the open-source playbook and replacing it with one that reads: Compute. Talent. Secrecy. The vibe is no longer “open source for all.” It’s “closed doors, infinite compute, elite team, existential stakes.” Let's break it down: (1) Compute: Zuck’s Manhattan Project Meta is building gigascale AI clusters. Prometheus comes online with 1 GW in 2026; Hyperion scales to 5 GW soon after. For context, Iceland’s total electricity consumption is ~2.4 GW, Cambodia is at ~4 GW. Meta’s Hyperion cluster alone could out-consume entire nations. These clusters are for training frontier models - GPT-4-class and beyond. In this new regime, FLOPS per researcher is the KPI, and Meta is going from GPU-starved to GPU-dripping. Each researcher now has more compute to play with than entire labs elsewhere. That’s not just good for performance, it's a hell of a recruiting pitch. (2) Secrecy: From Open Arms to Closed Labs Meta won developer love by open-sourcing its LLaMA models. But it also accidentally became the free R&D department for its own competitors. DeepSeek AI, for example, built on Meta's models and vaulted ahead. Now Meta is reportedly shelving its most powerful open model, Behemoth, due to both internal underperformance and external regret and shifting toward a closed frontier model, aligning more with OpenAI and Google. This is a massive philosophical reversal from “open wins” (as Yann LeCun would say) to “closed dominates.” (3) Talent: Just Buy Everyone Comp packages reportedly range from $200 million to $1 billion for AI leads. All AI efforts are now housed under a new unit, Superintelligence Labs, run by Alexandr Wang (ex-Scale AI). This elite team is small, only ~12 engineers, working in a separate, high-security building next to Zuckerberg himself. Forget beanbags and 10xers. This is a DARPA-style moonshot with a trillion-dollar company behind it. Zuckerberg has said, basically, “Look, we make a lot of money. We don’t need to ask anyone’s permission to spend it.” He’s not wrong. While OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI rely on outside capital to fund their ambitions, Meta runs on a $165B/year ad engine. And unlike Google and Microsoft - who have boards, activist investors, and share classes that allow for dissent - Zuckerberg controls Meta, structurally and operationally. Meta’s unique dual-class share structure gives Zuckerberg over 50% of the voting power, even though he owns less than 15% of the company. He doesn’t need anyone’s approval, he can build whatever he wants. This makes Meta less like a public company and more like a founder-led sovereign AI lab - with Big Tech cash and startup flexibility. That governance structure is a strategic weapon, letting them place bold, long-term bets at breathtaking speed. Meta’s open-source era is over. This is the closed, compute-soaked, capital-fueled empire play. Less GitHub, more Los Alamos.

Invisible UX is coming 🔥 And it’s going to change how we design products, forever. For decades, UX design has been about guiding users through an experience. We’ve done that with visible interfaces: Menus. Buttons. Cards. Sliders. We’ve obsessed over layouts, states, and transitions. But with AI, a new kind of interface is emerging: One that’s invisible. One that’s driven by intent, not interaction. Think about it: You used to: → Open Spotify → Scroll through genres → Click into “Focus” → Pick a playlist Now you just say: “Play deep focus music.” No menus. No tapping. No UI. Just intent → output. You used to: → Search on Airbnb → Pick dates, guests, filters → Scroll through 50+ listings Now we’re entering a world where you guide with words: “Find me a cabin near Oslo with a sauna, available next weekend.” So the best UX becomes barely visible. Why does this matter? Because traditional UX gives users options. AI-native UX gives users outcomes. Old UX: “Here are 12 ways to get what you want.” New UX: “Just tell me what you want & we’ll handle the rest.” And this goes way beyond voice or chat. It’s about reducing friction. Designing systems that understand intent. Respond instantly. And get out of the way. The UI isn’t disappearing. It’s mainly dissolving into the background. So what should designers do? Rethink your role. Going forward you’ll not just lay out screens. You’ll design interactions without interfaces. That means: → Understanding how people express goals → Guiding model behavior through prompt architecture → Creating invisible guardrails for trust, speed, and clarity You are basically designing for understanding. The future of UX won’t be seen. It will be felt. Welcome to the age of invisible UX. Ready for it?