LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. You can update your choices at any time in your settings.
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Aligning TSC (Trust Services Criteria) controls with a business risk profile means making sure that the rules and safeguards a company puts in place match the unique risks it faces, helping to protect key assets and maintain trust. By mapping controls to real business threats, companies can avoid both unnecessary measures and gaps, making their security approach fit their strategy and risk tolerance.
Assess current risks: Regularly review and document the risks your organization faces, including third-party and IT risks, so you can match controls to what matters most.
Customize control mapping: Use frameworks like COSO or NIST to align control activities with business processes and risk appetite, ensuring each control addresses a relevant threat.
Monitor and adjust: Set up ongoing audits and continuous monitoring to keep controls up to date and responsive to changes in your business environment or risk landscape.
CEO @ Crossover Corporate | Director and Instructor @ ICI Brazil | Audit Committee Member @ Sabesp | Board Member @ IIA Palm Beach County | Teacher @ FAE Business School and Trevisan Business School | Noah’s GrandFather
Internal control never exists in a vacuum. It is always a response to specific risk factors and a conscious decision about how much risk the corporation is willing to accept.
Before relying on sophisticated control frameworks, it is essential to understand whether each control actually alters the risk profile, from gross risk to residual risk, and whether this residual risk aligns with the organization's risk appetite. This is exactly what efficiency (design) and effectiveness tests aim to validate in a disciplined manner.
This diagram maps out the relationship between risk factors, gross risk, internal controls, and residual risk, demonstrating how design testing (efficiency) and operational testing (effectiveness) complement each other. It also highlights the decision point: when the residual risk falls within the risk appetite, monitoring is sufficient; when it exceeds it, control improvement becomes mandatory.
A control is not a checklist; it is a dynamic mechanism designed to keep risk exactly where the strategy dictates it should be.
E. Pardini, 2026
#InternalControl#RiskManagement#GrossRisk#ResidualRisk#RiskAppetite#ControlTesting#Governance#Audit#Compliance#CrossoverBrazil#BusinessSchool
🔐📋 AICPA IT General Controls Checklist
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has published a short but very practical guide: “An Essential Checklist for Implementing IT Controls”.
If you work as a #SOC1 / #SOC2#auditor or consultant, and #AICPA releases “good practice” materials like this, it’s worth reading. Even if many of the recommendations are not groundbreaking for experienced practitioners, it’s a helpful reference and a strong starting point for organizations building their IT control environment.
From my perspective (20+ years in the industry), the content is not “new,” but it clearly summarizes proven foundations that many organizations still struggle to implement consistently.
🛑 For organizations preparing for SOC 1 / SOC 2, this is a great “short guide” to sanity-check whether the foundations are in place.
✅ The guide frames #ITcontrols as #enterpriserisk, and highlights that weak IT controls can directly threaten financial reporting, operations, and reputation.
That message aligns perfectly with #SOC logic: #SOCreports are not about having tools, they are about trust backed by #governance, ownership, evidence, and repeatable execution.
✅ What’s inside
☑️ Phase 1: Governance and scoping (laying the foundation)
The document starts with “define the why and who before the what.”
It recommends:
➡️ Aligning IT risk with business objectives through a top-down risk assessment and identification of organizational “crown jewels”.
➡️ Establishing clear ownership using a RACI model and building organization-wide buy-in.
➡️ Selecting an appropriate framework instead of reinventing the wheel, referencing #COSO, #NISTCSF, and #COBIT.
☑️ Phase 2: Design and implementation (building controls)
This phase focuses on making controls designed effectively, auditable, and integrated with business functions.
It covers:
➡️ Documenting the current state: mapping data flows, inventorying systems, and documenting process narratives.
➡️ Designing and tailoring controls with “defense in depth,” prioritizing IT General Controls such as logical access, change management, system security, and data management, and automating controls where possible.
➡️ Addressing the human element through recurring training, communicating the “why,” and balancing controls with operational usability.
☑️ Phase 3: Testing and continuous monitoring
The guide stresses moving away from “set and forget” toward continuous evaluation.
It recommends:
➡️ Testing via UAT, dry-run audits (evidence readiness), and #independentvalidation.
➡️ #Continuousmonitoring using KRIs, dashboards, and governance committee oversight.
➡️ #IR and #DRP, including tabletop exercises and communication planning.
The robust IT controls require an enterprise-wide approach and must be maintained as a living framework that adapts to the changing threat landscape.
#cybersecurity#riskmanagement#ITGRC#TheSOC2#ITGRCAdvisory#BWAdvisory#AkademiaITGRCCyberMadeInPolandCyber London
GRC frameworks fail when they only document 𝐀𝐒-𝐈𝐒.
They succeed when they map 𝐀𝐒-𝐈𝐒 𝐭𝐨 𝐓𝐎-𝐁𝐄 with precision.
Resilient GRC isn’t just documentation.
It’s living architecture for governance, risk, and compliance.
The structure that I trust and recommend:
1. 𝐀𝐒-𝐈𝐒 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐌𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠
→ Identify current controls, gaps, redundancies
→ Map systems, roles, and data flows
→ Establish baseline compliance maturity
2. 𝐑𝐢𝐬𝐤 & 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠
→ Leverage ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, CIS Controls
→ Model risk impact and likelihood per asset
→ Include vendor and supply chain dependencies
3. 𝐓𝐎-𝐁𝐄 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐃𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧
→ Integrate control automation (SIEM, SOAR, IAM)
→ Embed continuous monitoring and reporting layers
→ Redesign roles for accountability and scalability
4. 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐑𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 & 𝐎𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧
→ Eliminate duplicate controls
→ Align security controls with business risk appetite
5. 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭 & 𝐈𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞
→ Conduct tabletop exercises + breach simulations
→ Validate controls under stress conditions
And The outcome is →
A GRC program that is measurable, adaptable, and aligned with enterprise digital transformation.
Static compliance is obsolete.
𝐃𝐲𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜, 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐆𝐑𝐂 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐝.
How dynamic is your current GRC framework?
#CISO#GRC#RiskManagement#ComplianceAutomation#CyberResilience#Governance#RiskandCompliance
Implementing COSO Principles: A Strategic Approach to Control Selection and Application
1. Understand the Control’s Purpose and Context
Identify the Objective:
Determine whether the control supports operational effectiveness, reliable financial reporting, or regulatory compliance (the three COSO objective categories).
Map to Processes:
Locate the control within the organization’s business processes (e.g., procurement, payroll, IT change management).
2. Conduct a Risk Assessment
Identify Risks:
Assess what risks the control is intended to mitigate (e.g., fraud, error, unauthorized access).
Evaluate Risk Severity:
Consider the likelihood and impact of each risk to prioritize controls and their alignment with COSO principles.
3. Map Controls to COSO Components and Principles
Component Alignment:
Determine which of the five COSO components the control supports:
*Control Environment
*Risk Assessment
*Control Activities
"Information & Communication
*Monitoring Activities
Principle Selection:
Within the relevant component, review the 17 COSO principles and select those that align with the control’s intent.
For example:
A segregation of duties control aligns with Principle 10 (Selects and develops control activities).
A quarterly risk review aligns with Principle 9 (Identifies and analyzes significant changes).
4. Use COSO’s Points of Focus
Detailed Guidance:
Each COSO principle includes “points of focus”-detailed attributes or actions that clarify how the principle can be achieved.
Applicability Assessment:
Compare the control’s design and operation to these points of focus. If the control addresses one or more points, it likely supports the corresponding principle.
5. Document the Mapping
Control Matrix:
Create a control matrix or register that lists controls, their objectives, associated risks, and the COSO principles they support.
Rationale:
Document the reasoning for each mapping, referencing risk assessments, process documentation, and points of focus.
6. Review and Update Regularly
Change Management:
As business processes, risks, or regulations change, reassess the controls and their alignment with COSO principles.
Internal Audit and External Review:
Periodically validate the mapping through internal audits or external assessments to ensure ongoing relevance and compliance.
Example: Mapping #COSO Principles to a Control
#Control: System access is limited to authorized personnel using unique user IDs and passwords.
#Objective: Safeguard assets and ensure data integrity (Operations and Reporting).
#Risk: Unauthorized access leading to data breaches or financial misstatements.
COSO Component: Control Activities
Relevant Principles:
*Principle 10: Mitigates risks through access controls.
*Principle 11: Implements technology controls for system security.
*Principle 13: Ensures only authorized users access and update information.
What if your biggest breach risk isn’t your internal systems—but a vendor you’ve never even assessed properly? How confident are you that your “approved vendors” list wouldn’t collapse under a basic audit of risk alignment and control effectiveness?
Validate that all third-party risks are captured in the enterprise risk register with clear ownership.
Check whether third-party risk categories map correctly to business processes, not just procurement lists.
Audit how each risk in the register is scored, justified, and periodically revalidated.
Verify vendor grouping uses logical operational categories instead of ad-hoc classifications.
Ensure vendor categorization is approved jointly by Risk + IT + Business, not procurement alone.
Review whether vendor lists are complete, up-to-date, and linked to their risk category.
Confirm that the risk–vendor matrix is maintained quarterly and not created once and forgotten.
Check for Critical Vendors with missing or outdated assessments—highest audit failure point.
Assess whether control mapping follows recognized frameworks (NIST/ISO), not subjective judgment.
Test whether internal controls like SSO, encryption, retention policies are enforced uniformly.
Review evidence that Zero Trust principles are embedded in access and integration workflows.
Ensure external vendor controls include pen tests, SOC 2, ISO 27001, DPAs, and SLA guarantees.
Verify document validity through expiry tracking, not trust-based vendor declarations.
Audit remediation plans for timeliness, follow-up, and closure documentation.
Check that assessment questionnaires are tiered by risk category, not one-size-fits-all.
Evaluate whether third-party onboarding includes risk scoring before contract approval.
Confirm that the risk treatment (Accept/Avoid/Mitigate/Transfer) is documented and approved.
Test a sample of high-risk vendors for evidence of control implementation, not just claims.
Audit vendor exit processes to ensure data destruction and access revocation controls.
Ensure continuous monitoring tools (alerts, logs, anomaly detection) are calibrated per vendor tier.
Review whether TPRM dashboards highlight trends, exceptions, and overdue assessments.
Evaluate cross-functional involvement—TPRM fails most when done in a silo.
“If regulators walked in today, could you prove that every critical vendor’s risk level is known, justified, controlled, and continuously monitored — or would the gaps tell a different story?”
#TPRM#ThirdPartyRisk#VendorGovernance#RiskRegister#ControlMapping#AuditReadiness#ZeroTrust#RiskMitigation#ContinuousMonitoring
Cyber Risk Management and Technology Consultant || GRC Professional || PCI-DSS Consultant || I help keep top organizations, Fintechs, and financial institutions secure by focusing on People, Process, and Technology.
Too often, the role of a GRC professional gets reduced to maintaining risk registers, updating heat maps, and chasing control evidence.
But real GRC work starts after the register is created — not before.
The true value of GRC is in aligning risk to business objectives.
Because risk doesn’t exist in isolation.
It exists in the context of what the business is trying to achieve.
If the company’s objective is rapid market expansion, the relevant risks are not the same as a company focused on cost leadership.
If the strategy is product innovation, risk tolerance will differ from a firm prioritizing operational stability.
This is where GRC becomes strategic.
A strong GRC professional translates business objectives into risk questions:
• What could prevent us from achieving this objective?
• What level of risk is acceptable to achieve it?
• Where are we over-controlling and slowing the business?
• Where are we under-controlled and exposed?
At this point, risk management shifts from documentation to decision support.
Instead of saying:
“Here are our top 10 risks.”
GRC should be saying:
“To achieve your growth target in X market, these are the 3 risks that matter most, this is your current exposure, and these are your options.”
That’s alignment.
Risk registers and heat maps are tools.
Business alignment is the outcome.
When GRC is done right, leadership doesn’t see it as compliance overhead.
They see it as a function that helps them take smarter risks — not fewer risks.
And that’s the real job.
#GRC#RiskManagement#Cybersecurity#Governance#BusinessStrategy
📍 Risk-Based Control Testing (RBCT) : Prioritizing Controls for Maximum Impact and Resource Optimization 📍
In today’s dynamic risk landscape, organizations face a constant challenge — how to effectively allocate limited resources to control testing activities without compromising risk mitigation. This is where risk-based control testing (RBCT) comes into play.
🔴🟠🟡 RBCT ensures that control testing efforts focus on the most critical risks that can impact the organization’s objectives, driving efficiency and better assurance outcomes.
📍 Why Risk-Based Control Testing Matters 📍
📍 Traditional control testing often treats all controls equally, leading to wasted effort on low-risk areas and insufficient attention on high-risk exposures. RBCT flips this model by:
🔴 Prioritizing controls linked to high-impact and high-likelihood risks
🟠 Reducing unnecessary testing of low-risk controls
🟡 Ensuring optimal use of limited time, budget, and expertise in control assurance
📍 Key Principles of Risk-Based Control Testing 📍
📍 To successfully implement RBCT, organizations should follow these core principles:
🔵 Risk Alignment: Testing activities should be directly aligned with the organization’s risk appetite and most significant risk categories.
🟢 Control Effectiveness: Focus on controls with the greatest potential to prevent or detect significant risks.
🟣 Dynamic Prioritization: Priorities should be revisited regularly to reflect changes in the risk environment and business operations.
🔴 Data-Driven Decision-Making: Use risk assessments, past audit results, and control performance data to guide testing plans.
📍 Benefits of Risk-Based Control Testing 📍
📍 Adopting RBCT delivers multiple benefits:
🟠 Enhanced risk visibility by concentrating on key risk areas
🟡 Improved control effectiveness through targeted testing
🟢 Greater resource efficiency and reduced operational costs
🔵 Better management and board assurance through focused reporting
📍 Implementing Risk-Based Control Testing: A Simple Framework 📍
📍 Follow these steps for an effective RBCT approach:
🔴 Identify and map controls to key risks
🟠 Assess risk severity and control impact
🟡 Prioritize controls based on risk and impact scores
🟢 Develop a testing schedule focused on high-priority controls
🔵 Continuously monitor and adjust testing priorities based on new data
📍 Forward-Thinking: RBCT in the Age of AI and Automation 📍
📍 Leveraging AI and automation tools can supercharge RBCT by providing real-time risk insights and automating routine testing tasks, allowing risk managers to focus on strategic control assessments.
Conclusion
📍 Risk-Based Control Testing is no longer a nice-to-have but a strategic imperative for modern risk management. By prioritizing controls that matter most, organizations can achieve maximum impact with optimized resources — driving stronger governance and risk resilience.
#controlsassurance#operationalrisk#riskmanagement#riskassessment