Innovations In Electrical Engineering

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Matthias Rebellius

    Member of the Managing Board of Siemens AG and CEO Smart Infrastructure at Siemens

    46,113 followers

    The shift from "smart" to "autonomous" infrastructure isn't optional – it's essential for the electrification of everything. When electricity grids started accepting renewable power from volatile sources in the 1990s, smart systems with dashboards and sensors were the answer. They’ve been a great success, enabling energy savings and managing decentralized power. But today’s challenges demand more than human decision-making supported by data – they require systems that act autonomously in milliseconds. The distinction is like GPS versus an autopilot. GPS tells you where to go; the autopilot flies the plane. As fluctuations in supply and demand bring existing grids to their limits, depending on dashboards is like flying through turbulence by hand. Autonomous buildings juggle multiple power sources minute-by-minute. Autonomous grids detect faults and reroute power in milliseconds using digital twins. The business case is compelling: smart buildings command higher valuations and higher rent, while saving on energy costs. Autonomous buildings can bring even more benefits. For grid operators, digitalized networks can double existing asset capacity and cut transformer upgrade costs significantly. The technology exists – AI, digital twins, and advanced semiconductors. What we need now is scale. Without autonomy, electrification risks stalling. With it, we get resilience, profitability and accelerated clean energy transition. #AutonomousInfrastructure #SmartGrids #DigitalTransformation #AI #Electrification

  • View profile for Alexey Navolokin

    FOLLOW ME for breaking tech news & content • helping usher in tech 2.0 • at AMD for a reason w/ purpose • LinkedIn persona •

    777,186 followers

    China just bent the rules of electronics — literally. Facinating? Chinese and global researchers are advancing Metal-Polymer Conductors (MPCs) — circuits made from liquid metals like gallium–indium embedded in elastic polymers — that defy traditional rigid wiring by remaining conductive even when stretched up to 500% or more. Why this is a big deal: 🔹 High Stretchability: Certain liquid-metal conductors maintain electrical conductivity even when stretched 5× their original length. 🔹 Durability: Printable metal-polymer conductors can withstand over 10,000 cycles of stretching with minimal resistance change (<3%). 🔹 Conductivity: Hybrid conductors based on indium alloys can achieve extremely high conductivity (~2.98 × 10⁶ S/m) with minimal resistance change under extreme strain. 🔹 Fine Feature Sizes: Advanced techniques can pattern circuits as small as 5 micrometers, rivaling conventional PCBs. Market Insight: The global market for wearable and flexible devices is expected to surge into the hundreds of billions of dollars, with advanced stretchable materials at the core of the next wave of innovation. (Wearable tech projected >US$150B by 2026 in soft electronics growth — wearable industry data) Where AI Fits In: AI is not just hype — it’s accelerating how we design and discover materials like MPCs. AI/ML models help predict material properties — like conductivity and mechanical resilience — before physical prototypes are made. Computational simulations can evaluate thousands of polymer + metal combinations far faster than physical testing alone. AI-assisted optimization reduces lab iterations, cutting time and cost in early-stage development. In other words: AI + materials science = faster discovery of smarter, stretchable electronics. Potential Applications: Soft robotics that mimic human motion Wearables that feel like fabric Artificial skin with embedded sensing Health monitoring devices that conform to the body On-skin motion recognition and bioelectronics. The era of electronics you can twist, stretch, and wear is here — and AI is helping make it a reality. #FlexibleElectronics #MaterialsScience #AIinInnovation #SoftRobotics #WearableTech #DeepTech #FutureOfElectronics #Innovation

  • View profile for Alibek Issagaliyev

    R&D Technical Project Manager | HVDC & AC Power Systems | Electrical Engineering Leadership

    3,812 followers

    🌍 Half the towers, half the land. Welcome to the world of HVDC. This image shows two transmission systems, both operating at 800 kV. But there’s a big difference between HVAC (alternating current) and HVDC (direct current). 🏗️ On the left: 800 kV AC (two three-phase lines) ➤ Requires a right-of-way (ROW) width of ~320 ft (~100 m) ➤ 6 conductors (2 circuits × 3 phases) ➤ Large towers with wide phase spacing to reduce corona discharge ⚡ On the right: ±800 kV DC (one HVDC line) ➤ Only ~130 ft (~40 m) ROW width ➤ Just 2 conductors (bipolar configuration: + and −) ➤ More compact tower, lower profile, reduced EM fields and losses 🔍 Why HVDC is more efficient: ✅ 40–60% less land use ✅ Significantly lower losses over distances >600–800 km ✅ No reactive power = better efficiency and control ✅ Ideal for underground, subsea, mountainous, or densely populated routes ✅ Transmits up to 6400 MW on a single corridor 📌 Real-world example: Yunnan–Guangdong ±800 kV UHVDC (China) ➤ Length: 1,418 km ➤ Power capacity: 6400 MW ➤ Configuration: Bipolar overhead transmission ➤ Delivers hydropower from Yunnan to industrial Guangdong ➤ Reduces losses, land footprint, and CO₂ emissions 📐 HVDC isn’t just an alternative it’s how we optimize large-scale transmission: less land, lower losses, more power. #HVDC #UHVDC #PowerTransmission #EnergyInfrastructure#GridEngineering #ElectricalEngineering #SustainableEnergy #SmartGrid#HVACvsHVDC #ChinaEnergy

  • View profile for Jigar Shah
    Jigar Shah Jigar Shah is an Influencer

    Host of the Energy Empire and Open Circuit podcasts

    750,979 followers

    We’ve entered the biggest era of electricity demand growth since World War II. With 150 GW of new load expected in the next five years, we can’t afford to treat virtual power plants (VPPs) and distributed energy resources (DERs) as experimental. We need to position them as core infrastructure, on par with gas, wind, solar, and transmission. In my latest byline for Utility Dive, I write about the shift underway: utilities are no longer gatekeepers: they’re buyers. Programs like Xcel Energy’s Distributed Capacity Procurement and Exelon’s utility-scale battery filings show that when DERs are treated as capacity, not just flexible demand, utilities respond. This moment calls for alignment, not tribalism. It’s not about who owns the asset. It’s about who delivers reliable, scalable capacity. The companies building and operating DERs are solving real utility challenges, and they deserve a seat at the planning table. Let’s focus on outcomes, unlock scale, and build with urgency.

  • View profile for Jan Rosenow
    Jan Rosenow Jan Rosenow is an Influencer

    Professor of Energy and Climate Policy at Oxford University │ Senior Associate at Cambridge University │ World Bank Consultant │ Board Member │ LinkedIn Top Voice │ FEI │ FRSA

    111,369 followers

    Pakistan’s solar surge is a striking example of bottom-up energy transition. I spoke with The Christian Science Monitor about how households and businesses in Pakistan are rapidly turning to solar—not because of climate policy, but because it’s cheaper than conventional power. When electricity prices rise and solar costs fall, people innovate. The result: a self-driven market shift that outpaces policy. Key takeaways: - Cost is the catalyst. With conventional tariffs soaring, affordable Chinese panels are enabling widespread adoption. - Diffusion is decentralized. Much of the know-how spreads via social media and peer learning. - System effects matter. As more customers self-generate, utilities sell fewer units—raising per‑unit costs and potentially accelerating the shift further. - Policy challenge ahead. Governments must reform market design and tariffs to maintain reliable, equitable systems while supporting distributed renewables and storage.

  • View profile for David Hall
    David Hall David Hall is an Influencer

    Toha Network Co-Founder + Executive Director | LinkedIn Top Green Voice | IPCC Contributing Author (AR6 WG2) | AUT Industry Fellow | Te Whare Tūroa – AUT Regenerative Environments Research Network

    9,608 followers

    We usually talk about ‘the energy transition’ in the singular. But, in #electricity, there’s at least two transitions underway: 1️⃣ the transition from #fossil energy to #renewable energy in electricity generation. 2️⃣ the transition from #centralised to #decentralised electricity systems. In Aotearoa New Zealand, we’re well advanced in the first transition to renewable electricity generation. More than 80% of our electricity comes from renewable sources, mostly #hydropower, increasingly #wind and #solar. But we have a long way to go on the second transition – from a centralised to a decentralised electricity system. Currently, our electricity system mostly relies on large-scale sources of generation and a lot of distribution. About 60% of our electricity comes from hydro-electric dams, the large share from several schemes in Te Wai Pounamu. With Lake Onslow, we almost committed to one big battery in the same region, a long way from most demand. That’s a centralised approach. However, technology trends point toward a future electricity system with many smaller generators and batteries that distribute electricity closer to where it is used. The epitome is rooftop solar, which only travels a few metres from the roof to the plug. But the transition to decentralisation will also feature more home and grid-scale batteries, more solar and wind farms, more distributed energy assets (DER) which shift demand and supply. This complexity brings transition challenges, which Aotearoa NZ is only beginning to wrestle with. But it can also increase the #resilience of the system as a whole. In a centralised system, a disruption to any single asset or transmission line has serious implications for the whole grid. By contrast, in a decentralised system, the loss of a few assets leaves many more untouched, which can serve as back up. Also, because electricity is generated closer to where it is consumed, the system is less exposed to transmission disruptions. This is critical as the impacts of #ClimateChange intensify. Learn more in Rewiring Aotearoa’s new explainer series, #WattNow? Our first explainer is about ‘electrification for humans’, including #EnergyResilience by decentralising and localising our electricity system. On that front, as the chart suggests, we've got a long way to go. Read here: https://lnkd.in/eMiTr7hN #ElectrifyEverything #Electrification #EnergyTransition #RenewableEnergy

  • View profile for Manoj Sinha

    TIME100 | Co-Founder & CEO at Husk | Independent Board Member l Angel investor

    14,576 followers

    Most large-scale energy initiatives follow the same pattern: start with big commitments, roll out connections, figure out the policy later. Nigeria did the opposite. And that’s why it’s working. Instead of treating private investment as an afterthought, Nigeria built the policy framework first. And that made all the difference. What Nigeria Got Right - 1. A Structured Energy Compact – Nigeria created a clear, integrated policy that combines grid expansion, mini-grids, and decentralized solutions into a single plan. Other countries still treat off-grid power as an afterthought. 2. Private Sector Was Built Into the Model – Most African energy plans rely almost entirely on government spending. Nigeria understood that public money alone won’t be enough, so they de-risked the investment landscape for private players. 3. Policy Stability That Investors Can Trust – The biggest deterrent to energy investment is regulatory unpredictability. Nigeria structured clear rules around licensing, tariffs, and long-term market participation, giving businesses and investors the ability to plan long-term—not just react to political cycles. The Results Speak for Themselves - - Nigeria is now the leading mini-grid market in Africa. - Private capital is flowing into the energy sector at scale. - The policy model is structured for real expansion—not just short-term funding cycles. Now compare this to many other Mission 300 countries - - There’s no clear strategy to integrate decentralized and centralized power. - Investment risk is still too high for private capital to flow at scale. - The policy landscape remains too unstable for long-term planning. Nigeria isn’t perfect. But it’s one of the few places where energy policy is being built for growth, not just for the next round of funding. If Mission 300 countries want to make real progress, this is the playbook - - Stable, investment-friendly regulation - A clear plan that integrates all forms of power - Long-term market structures that attract capital at scale Energy access is an industry, not a one-time intervention. And Nigeria is proving that when the policy is right, the investment follows. #NigeriaEnergy #Mission300 #SmartInvestment #EnergyForGrowth

  • View profile for Ross Dawson
    Ross Dawson Ross Dawson is an Influencer

    Futurist | Board advisor | Global keynote speaker | Founder: AHT Group - Informivity - Bondi Innovation | Humans + AI Leader | Bestselling author | Podcaster | LinkedIn Top Voice

    35,011 followers

    The last two days have seen two extremely interesting breakthroughs announced in quantum computing. There is a long path ahead, but these both point to the potential for dramatically upscaling ambitions for what's possible in relatively short timeframes. The most prominent advance was Microsoft's announcement of Majorana 1, a chip powered by "topological qubits" using a new material. This enables hardware-protected qubits that are more stable and fault-tolerant. The chip currently contains 8 topologic qubits, but it is designed to house one million. This is many orders of dimension larger than current systems. DARPA has selected the system for its utility-scale quantum computing program. Microsoft believes they can create a fault-tolerant quantum computer prototype in years. The other breakthrough is extraordinary: quantum gate teleportation, linking two quantum processes using quantum teleportation. Instead of packing millions of qubits into a single machine—which is exceptionally challenging—this approach allows smaller quantum devices to be connected via optical fibers, working together as one system. Oxford University researchers proved that distributed quantum computing can perform powerful calculations more efficiently than classical systems. This could not only create a pathway to workable quantum computers, but also a quantum internet, enabling ultra-secure communication and advanced computational capabilities. It certainly seems that the pace of scientific progress is increasing. Some of the applications - such as in quantum computing - could have massive implications, including in turn accelerating science across domains.

  • View profile for Craig Scroggie
    Craig Scroggie Craig Scroggie is an Influencer

    CEO & MD, NEXTDC | AI infrastructure, energy systems, sovereignty

    44,187 followers

    For most of the last century, generators stabilised the grid as a by-product of producing energy. Today, we are building assets that stabilise the grid without producing energy at all. That shift identifies the binding constraint. Electricity system transition is no longer constrained by renewable resource availability. It is constrained by deliverability and operability. In inverter-dominated systems under rapid load growth, the binding constraints are: - transmission and major substation capacity - system strength, fault levels, frequency and voltage control - connection and commissioning throughput - secure operation under worst-day conditions - execution pace across networks and system services Generation capacity remains necessary. On its own, it no longer delivers firm supply or supports large new loads. Historically, synchronous generators supplied energy and stability together. Inertia, fault current, voltage support, and controllability were implicit. As synchronous plant retires, these services must be provided explicitly. Stability shifts from physics-led to control-led. System behaviour becomes more sensitive to modelling accuracy, protection coordination, control settings, and real-time visibility. Curtailment is not excess energy. It is a deliverability or security constraint. When transmission and substations lag generation, congestion and curtailment rise. Independent analysis shows that delay increases prices and emissions by extending reliance on higher-cost thermal generation. Distribution networks are no longer passive. They now host distributed generation, storage, EV charging, and large loads at the edge of transmission. Voltage control, protection coordination, hosting capacity, and connection throughput now constrain both decarbonisation and industrial growth. Firming is a hard requirement. Batteries provide fast frequency response and contingency arrest. They do not provide multi-day energy and do not replace networks or system strength in weak grids. Demand response reduces peaks. It cannot be relied upon for system-wide security under stress. Execution speed is critical. Slow delivery increases congestion duration, curtailment exposure, reserve requirements, and reliance on ageing plant. These effects flow directly into costs, emissions, and reliability. This is why electricity bills can rise even when average wholesale prices fall. Costs are driven by peak demand, contingencies, and security, not average energy. Large digital and industrial loads are transmission-scale, continuous, and failure-intolerant. They increase contingency size and correlation risk. At that scale, loads do not connect to the grid, they shape it. Supporting growth requires time-to-power, transmission and substation capacity in load corridors, explicit system strength and fault levels, operable firming under worst-day conditions, scalable connection and commissioning, and early procurement of long lead time HV equipment. #energy

  • View profile for Ibrahim AlMohaisin

    Electrical Engineering Consultant | SMIEEE |Shaping Engineering Leaders | Empowering Technical Talent | Renewable Energy | Mentor, Trainer & Advisory Board Member| Vice Chair of the Board of AEEE

    11,683 followers

    Following the wide recognition of Grid-Forming (GFM) inverters as a cornerstone for grid stability, the focus of innovation is rapidly shifting from “forming” the grid to actively orchestrating it. The next frontier blends intelligence, adaptability, and cross-domain interaction — pushing power systems into what experts now call the Grid 3.0 era. Here’s where research and advanced practice are heading : ① Multi-Mode & Hybrid-Compatible Inverters (HC-GFIs) Next-gen converters can seamlessly operate in GFM or GFL modes depending on system strength — enhancing flexibility and resilience under changing conditions (Nature Scientific Reports, 2025; ArXiv Energy Systems, 2024). ② Unified AC/DC & Dual-Port Architectures Dual-port inverters are enabling hybrid microgrids, dynamically balancing AC and DC power flows to integrate solar, storage, and EV systems with unprecedented efficiency. ③ Wide-Area Damping via PMU-Driven Control Using synchronized phasor measurements and edge computing, wide-area damping control (WADC) coordinates multiple GFMs, HVDC links, and FACTS devices — achieving real-time system stabilization even in weak grids. ④ Digital, Predictive & AI-Assisted Operations AI-enabled predictive control is now being used to anticipate voltage instabilities, optimize inertia emulation, and coordinate fleets of distributed GFMs (NREL Digital Twin Grid Initiative, 2024). ⑤ Virtual Power Plants (VPPs) & Hydrogen-Linked Storage Thousands of GFMs, EVs, and hydrogen fuel systems are being aggregated into Virtual Power Plants capable of grid support, black-start, and ancillary services at national scale. ▪️In essence: we’re evolving from grid-forming to grid-intelligent systems — adaptive, self-healing, and data-driven. The future grid will not only be stable; it will be strategically aware. #GridForming #GridIntelligence #PowerSystems #BESS #HybridGrids #AIinEnergy #VPP #EnergyTransition #IEEE_PES

Explore categories