Overcoming Hiring Biases

LinkedIn asks you to post today to celebrate "a woman who's made an impact on your career." But these kinds of posts, even earnestly written, tend to leave us feeling hollow. If we're looking for real progress towards fairness and equality at work, here's what to do instead: 🪴 Did you know that if there's only one woman on a shortlist of qualified candidates, she has a whopping 0% chance of being hired? Simply expanding shortlists to include more than one woman (and for that matter, people from historically marginalized communities) helps counter biased decision-making. 📋 Standardized process can be a surprisingly easy way to mitigate bias. Structured interviewing, standardized skill-based assessments directly related to job tasks, and standardized scoring rubrics can make comparisons across candidates more fair and substantially reduce subtle gender discrimination. 🌻 Incentivize flexibility for ALL workers, not just women. In a vacuum, harmful norms may arise that imply these arrangements are only utilized by those who "don't value their careers as much," penalizing workers of all genders. Celebrate senior leaders, especially men, who model greater flexibility and wellbeing so that all workers are licensed to do the same. 🔍 Conduct a pay equity audit, seeking to examine not only outcomes like total compensation, but also distribution of candidates across roles. If men and women in the same role are getting paid similarly, but women are dramatically overclustered in low-paying roles, you've still got a problem. ❤️🩹 Create an anonymous and/or informal process to report and addressing discrimination and harassment. A lower-stakes way to address harm, in addition to training bystander intervention and modelling respectful communication, accountability, and timely feedback from the top, can mitigate daily harms for all workers. Some folks hesitate to push for these practices because they feel more committing than just posting on social media. They're right — because with more effort comes more impact. So reach out to a few of your colleagues and advocates within your workplace to work together on pushing for these changes. Ten posts in isolation pale in comparison to the impact ten peoples' collective organizing might have on your workplace and everyone in it! Remember: International Women's Day is a chance for us not just to celebrate women, but to sharpen our advocacy alongside women, to build a future that's better, brighter, and more fair for all of us.

LinkedIn just responded to the bias claims. They think they refuted my research. I believe they just confirmed it. Following the recent discussions on whether the algorithm suppresses women's voices, LinkedIn's Head of Responsible AI and AI Governance, Sakshi Jain, posted a new Engineering Blog post to "clarify" how the feed works (link in comments). I’ve analysed the post. Far from debunking the issue, it inadvertently confirms the exact mechanism of Proxy Bias I identified in my report (link in comments). Here is the breakdown: 1. The blog spends most of its time denying that the algorithm uses "gender" as a variable. And I agree. My report never claimed the code contained if gender == female. That would be Direct Discrimination. I have always argued this is about Indirect Discrimination via proxies. 2. Crucially, the blog explicitly lists the signals they do optimise for: "position," "industry," and "activity." These are the exact proxies my report flagged. -> Industry/Position: Men are historically overrepresented in high-visibility industries (Tech/Finance) and senior roles. Optimising for these signals without a fairness constraint systematically amplifies men. -> Activity: The (now-viral) trend of women rewriting profiles in "male-coded" language (and seeing 3-figure percentage lift) proves that the algorithm’s "activity" signal favours male linguistic patterns ("agentic" vs. "communal"). 3. The blog confirms the algorithm is neutral in intent (it doesn't see gender) but discriminatory in outcome (because it optimises for biased proxies). In the UK, this is the textbook definition of Indirect Discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. In the EU, this is a Systemic Risk under the Digital Services Act (DSA). LinkedIn has proven that they can fix this. Their Recruiter product uses "fairness-aware ranking" to mitigate these exact proxies (likely for AI Act compliance). The question remains: Why is that same fairness framework not being applied to the public feed? 👉 What We Are Doing About It Analysis is important, but action is essential. I am proud to support the new petition, "Calling for Fair Visibility for All on LinkedIn". This isn't just a complaint; it’s a demand for transparency. We are calling for an independent equity audit of the algorithm and a clear mechanism to report unexplained visibility collapse. If you are tired of guessing which "proxy" you tripped over today, join us and sign the petition (link in the comments).

Louder for the people at the back 🎤 Many organisations today seem to have shifted from being institutions that develop great talent to those that primarily seek ready-made talent. This trend overlooks the immense value of individuals who, despite lacking experience, possess a great attitude, commitment, and a team-oriented mindset. These qualities often outweigh the drawbacks of hiring experienced individuals with a fixed and toxic mindset. The best organisations attract talent with their best years ahead of them, focusing on potential rather than past achievements. Let’s be clear this is more about mindset and willingness to learn and unlearn as apposed to age. To realise the incredible potential return, organisations must commit to creating an environment where continuous development is possible. This requires a multi-faceted approach: 1. Robust Training Programmes: Employers should invest in comprehensive training programmes that equip employees with the necessary skills for their roles. This includes on-the-job training, mentorship programmes, online courses, and workshops. 2. Redefining Hiring Criteria: Organisations should revise their hiring criteria to focus more on candidates’ potential and willingness to learn rather than solely on prior experience or formal qualifications. Behavioural interviews, aptitude tests, and probationary periods can help assess a candidate's ability to learn and adapt. 3. Partnerships with Educational Institutions: Companies can collaborate with educational institutions to design curricula that align with industry needs. Apprenticeship programmes, internships, and cooperative education can bridge the gap between academic learning and practical job skills. 4. Lifelong Learning Culture: Encouraging a culture of lifelong learning within organisations is crucial. Employers should provide ongoing education opportunities and support for professional development. This includes continuous skills assessment and access to resources for upskilling and reskilling. 5. Inclusive Recruitment Practices: Employers should implement inclusive recruitment practices that remove biases and barriers. Blind recruitment, diversity quotas, and targeted outreach programmes can help ensure that diverse candidates are given a fair chance. By implementing these measures, organisations can develop a workforce that is adaptable, innovative, and resilient, ensuring sustainable success and growth.

"I hired them 30 minutes into the interview. When you know, you know!" "I know 5 minutes into an interview if I'm going to hire them or not!" "I don't need anyone else to interview a candidate for my team, I'm confident enough in my decision-making to make a hire!" This stuff always goes viral and jobseekers love it because at first glance, it's a story of efficiency and decisiveness and an easier hiring process which anyone in this job market wants. But give it a second read, and you realize that it's not the story of a great hiring process, it's the story of an inequitable one. If you're deciding whether or now you're going to hire someone a few minutes into an interview, you are doing that based on your gut instincts - and those gut instincts are shaped by a range of things - previous experiences, our emotions and mood going into the interview, our response to unrelated sensory inputs like a familiar scent, someone who looks like us or is wearing something we have at home or who reminds us of a loved one. In other words, a whole lot of bias that has nothing to do with a candidate's ability to do the job. Y'all I know that long processes with multiple interviews can be frustrating. But they are also one of the best tools we have to guard against bias: - interviews with different individuals means one person's bad day or personal biases don't tank your chances. - getting input from different stakeholders you would work with in the role means that a variety of perspectives are considered. - a range of interview types - behavioral questions about past experience, skills assessments to ensure someone can actually walk the walk, and conversations around values and vision for the role help ensure that we're not making assumptions about what someone brings to the table based on a past employer or their ability to say the right things. And these experiences also give candidates multiple view points on working at the company, and a better idea of the people they'd interact with day in and day out, and what the work is like. The truth is that a lot of those popular stories aren't stories about a recruiter or hiring manager who cares about candidate experience. They're stories about people who engage in biased hiring practices, and either don't realize it or don't care, or of people who want to go viral, even if that means encouraging and normalizing biased hiring practices.

𝗜𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘁𝘁𝘆 𝗴𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗷𝗼𝗯? — 𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘥𝘺 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴 𝘮𝘢𝘺𝘣𝘦. We often talk about meritocracy in hiring — but research keeps reminding us how easily optics overshadow objectivity. 📊 A 2024 study by Harvard Business Review found that 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝟱𝟬% 𝗼𝗳 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. Similarly, research in the 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘈𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘥 𝘗𝘴𝘺𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘗𝘴𝘺𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭 𝘚𝘤𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 confirms that 𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱 — even when their résumés are identical to less “polished” counterparts. This isn’t vanity; it’s psychology. It’s called the “𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗼 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁” — a cognitive bias where one positive trait (like appearance or confidence) spills over to how we judge unrelated qualities (like intelligence or leadership). And it’s costly. Because every time we let surface cues dictate selection, we risk 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗲𝘁 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 that doesn’t advertise itself well. The solution isn’t to ignore presentation — it’s to balance perception with structure: • 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝘀 and 𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗹𝗹-𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀. • Involve 𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗹𝘀 to reduce individual bias. • Train leaders to recognize 𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗼 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝗿𝗻 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 — before they unconsciously act on them. 💬 𝘐𝘯 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘱, 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘣𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘴 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘵𝘴. #HiringBias #OrganizationalPsychology #Leadership #UnconsciousBias #DEI #FutureOfWork

"You're overqualified." Translation: "We think you'll leave, want too much money, or won't take direction." Maria heard this 15 times. VP experience. 52 years old. "Too senior" for everything. Then she flipped the script. Literally. Her new response: "I appreciate that. Can I share why this role is exactly where I want to be?" Then she'd say: "I've been the VP managing 50 people and $20M budgets. It was rewarding but exhausting. What excites me now is going deep on strategy without the politics. Your role offers exactly that - impact without the bureaucracy. And honestly? I've made my money. I'm optimizing for fulfillment now, not titles." 3 offers in 4 weeks. Here's the psychology: Employers fear 3 things about "overqualified" candidates: 1. Flight risk (you'll leave when something better comes) 2. Salary expectations (you'll want VP money) 3. Management issues (you won't respect younger bosses) Address all three directly: "I'm intentionally stepping back from VP life. I've done the 70-hour weeks. Your role lets me use my expertise at a sustainable pace. As for salary, I'm looking at total compensation and culture, not just base. And taking direction? I've been seeking mentorship my whole career. Some of my best bosses were 15 years younger." One client used this exact script. Hired at asking salary. Still there 2 years later. Happier than ever. "Overqualified" is nonsense. And, it's an invitation to address their real concerns. Have you tried directly addressing the "overqualified" label? Tired of hearing 'overqualified'? My team helps experienced professionals reposition their story so employers see value, not risk. Book a call using the blue link above. #LinkedInTopVoices #LITrendingTopics #Careers

I’m going to say something that might make me unlikeable (and I can live with that): Your desperate need to be liked at work is sabotaging your career. I see it everywhere. My client Sarah apologizes before sharing her brilliant strategy. Maya brings donuts (the expensive kind!) to soften the blow before delivering critical feedback. Jin laughs off her own promotion idea because she’s afraid it sounds “too aggressive.” The “Likability Trap” is keeping women stuck in the shallow end of professional respect. And while you’re busy being the office sweetheart, your ideas get credited to someone else. Your expertise gets questioned. Your leadership gets labeled as “lucky” instead of earned. The cost isn’t just your next promotion; it’s an entire generation of women watching and learning that nice matters more than competent. (Are you mad at me yet?) Here’s your permission slip to stop performing likability: 1. Stop apologizing for your expertise. Replace “Sorry, but I think…” with “My experience shows…” (Revolutionary, I know.) 2. Lead with competence, not charm. Share your wins without immediately deflecting or diminishing them. Yes, it feels weird at first. Do it anyway. 3. Make your boundaries non-negotiable. “I’m not available for that” is a complete sentence. Practice saying it in the mirror if you have to. 4. Disagree without disclaimers. Skip the “This might be wrong, but…” Just state your position clearly. The world won’t end, I promise. 5. Advocate for yourself loudly. If you don’t champion your work, no one else will. And contrary to popular belief, this doesn’t make you difficult – it makes you professional. You have permission to be respected more than you are liked. You have permission to prioritize your professional growth over others’ comfort. You have permission to be seen as competent, capable, and yes, sometimes challenging. Here’s what I really, really want you to know: Respect opens doors that likability never will. You deserve to walk through every single one of them. And so do I. #womenleaders #respect #boundaries

when we started leap.club, we believed in a very clean, almost comforting idea of progress. if women were competent, supported and given access to the right rooms, the world would change for us. so we built those rooms. we built a community of thousands of women, ran masterclasses, curated networks, built courses, launched a jobs platform with highly vetted companies and created physical spaces where women could learn, grow and finally feel that they belonged. i genuinely believed that if we just removed the structural friction - the lack of access, the lack of mentorship, the lack of opportunity - everything would shift. well, it didn’t. not in the way i expected atleast. over six years of building leap, and having a front-row seat to the many incredible moves so many women were making, i still watched some of the most capable women i’ve ever met stay stuck. i watched them do exceptional work, carry entire teams on their shoulders and still struggle to move into positions of real power. that’s when the most uncomfortable lesson slowly landed for me: competence does not automatically translate into power. in this piece, i write about the good girl trap, the myth we’re sold about ambition, how conditioning shapes our careers, and what actually moves the needle when women want influence, authority, and real leverage. if you’ve ever done everything ‘right’ and still felt invisible - this one is for you :)

Your competence at work is judged in seconds. Even when you over-deliver, you can be underestimated. Every day, false assumptions about you are made: — Polite = Weak — Older = Not agile — A foreign accent = Less capable — Introverted =  Not a strong leader — Woman =  Softer voice, less authority It's not just unfair. It's exhausting. So the question is: How do you beat biases without changing who you are? Here’s what I recommend: 𝟭. 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 → Speak about impact, not effort. → Articulate your value proposition. →“Here’s the problems I solve. Here's how. Here’s the result."  If no one knows what you bring to the table, they won’t invite you to it. 𝟮. 𝗩𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿 Silent excellence is wasted potential. → Speak up when it feels risky. → Build real not just strategic relationships. → Share insights where people are paying attention. You don’t need to be loud. You need to be seen. 𝟯. 𝗧𝘂𝗿𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 The traits that trigger assumptions? Those are your edge. → Introverted? That’s deep listening. → Accent? That’s global perspective. Don’t flatten yourself to fit. Distinguish yourself to lead. 𝟰. 𝗢𝘄𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 → Say “I recommend” not "I think.” → Hold eye contact. Take up space. → Act like your presence belongs (even when others haven’t caught up.) Confidence isn’t volume. It’s grounding. Bias is everywhere. But perception can be changed. Don't let other people's false assumptions define you. Do you agree? ➕ Follow Deena Priest for strategic career insights. 📌Join my newsletter to build a career grounded in progress, peace and pay.

Inclusion isn’t a one-time initiative or a single program—it’s a continuous commitment that must be embedded across every stage of the employee lifecycle. By taking deliberate steps, organizations can create workplaces where all employees feel valued, respected, and empowered to succeed. Here’s how we can make a meaningful impact at each stage: 1. Attract Build inclusive employer branding and equitable hiring practices. Ensure job postings use inclusive language and focus on skills rather than unnecessary credentials. Broaden recruitment pipelines by partnering with diverse professional organizations, schools, and networks. Showcase your commitment to inclusion in external messaging with employee stories that reflect diversity. 2. Recruit Eliminate bias and promote fair candidate evaluation. Use structured interviews and standardized evaluation rubrics to reduce bias. Train recruiters and hiring managers on unconscious bias and inclusive hiring practices. Implement blind resume reviews or AI tools to focus on qualifications, not identifiers. 3. Onboard Create an inclusive onboarding experience. Design onboarding materials that reflect a diverse workplace culture. Pair new hires with mentors or buddies from Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) to foster belonging. Offer inclusion training early to set the tone for inclusivity from day one. 4. Develop Provide equitable opportunities for growth. Ensure leadership programs and career development resources are accessible to underrepresented employees. Regularly review training, mentorship, and promotion programs to address any disparities. Offer specific development opportunities, such as allyship training or workshops on cultural competency. 5. Engage Foster a culture of inclusion. Actively listen to employee feedback through pulse surveys, focus groups, and open forums. Support ERGs and create platforms for marginalized voices to influence organizational policies. Recognize and celebrate diverse perspectives, cultures, and contributions in the workplace. 6. Retain Address barriers to equity and belonging. Conduct pay equity audits and address discrepancies to ensure fairness. Create flexible policies that accommodate diverse needs, including caregiving responsibilities, religious practices, and accessibility. Provide regular inclusion updates to build trust and demonstrate progress. 7. Offboard Learn and grow from employee transitions. Use exit interviews to uncover potential inequities and areas for improvement. Analyze trends in attrition to identify and address any patterns of exclusion or bias. Maintain relationships with alumni and invite them to stay engaged through inclusive networks. Embedding inclusion across the employee lifecycle is not just the right thing to do—it’s a strategic imperative that drives innovation, engagement, and organizational success. By making these steps intentional, companies can create environments where everyone can thrive.