On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 13:41 +0100, Ulf Wendel wrote:
> Am 31.01.2014 13:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
> > I think adding this patch to 5.x therefore would be quite some bending
> > of that rule and that combined with the fact that it is late makes me
> > believe that proposing this for 5.6 is illegal.
>
> Are you saying the RFC is 'illegal' ? If the subject proposed is not
> allowed, it would make litte sense collecting votes.
I think the RM has to reject this from 5.6 independently from the voting
result as he is bound by the release process RFC.
johannes