On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ulf Wendel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am 31.01.2014 13:55, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
>> On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 13:41 +0100, Ulf Wendel wrote:
>>> Am 31.01.2014 13:36, schrieb Johannes Schlüter:
>>>> I think adding this patch to 5.x therefore would be quite some bending
>>>> of that rule and that combined with the fact that it is late makes me
>>>> believe that proposing this for 5.6 is illegal.
>>>
>>> Are you saying the RFC is 'illegal' ? If the subject proposed is not
>>> allowed, it would make litte sense collecting votes.
>>
>> I think the RM has to reject this from 5.6 independently from the voting
>> result as he is bound by the release process RFC.
>
> Thanks for explaining. The three takeaway point for me are:
>
> - you are serious about following the rules
Seriously. which rule define this RFC or any other RFC breaking ABI as
not allowed? There is none. And this discussions takes a ridiculous
course, can we be serious now please? :)
> - a radical minded person may refuse to vote in the first place
I would say extremist, but yes ;)
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org