Yes it does require changes in the extensions. I must say we’ve been able to hammer through them
pretty quickly but it does require change due to the refactoring of the data types. It’s a
refactoring exercise though not a rewrite. So relatively speaking not too painful and I think
we’ve already worked through many of them so there are a lot of examples.
Andi
On May 5, 2014, at 7:16 AM, Andrea Faulds <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 5 May 2014, at 15:15, Dmitry Stogov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I would say it must be 100% compatible at the end, may be with exception for very rare and
>> unclear cases that worked just because of existing implementation. (e.g. mixing foreach and next()
>> on the same array).
>
> Of course it’s compatible with user land, what I meant to ask was how compatible is the ABI?
> Would this require a lot of changes to extensions and such?
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
>
>