Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
From: Dmitry Stogov Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 00:22:42 +0000 Subject: Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement References: 1 2 3 4 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
yes. it must be easier to implement (less places have to be changed), but it may increase memory consumption. Thanks. Dmitry. On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi! > > > Anyway, I think 64-bit integer support on Windows64 makes full sense and > > it's possible to add it into "phpng" right now. > > > > I'm not so sure about size_t string length. > > Shouldn't it be easier in phpng with everything using zend_string* > instead of char*+int? As far as I can see, making zend_string use 64-bit > length should be more or less painless, and then we only need to watch > out when we take string length and assign it to some other variable, > which shouldn't be too many places I hope. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 >
Thread (123 messages)
- Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
- Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
- Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
- Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improveme nt
- Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
- Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
- Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
« previous | php.internals (#73926) | next » |
---|