Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement

From: Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:24:11 +0000
Subject: Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message 
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Dmitry Stogov <[email protected]> wrote:
> the performance difference may be significant.
> For example qdig.
>
> mod_php (PIC)       440 req/sec
> FastCGI (non-PIC)  537 req/sec
>
> The bechmark was done with 32-bit build of phpng.
>
> I didn't get time to investigate it in all details, but it'll really make
> sense.

Not sure on linux, but a good configured apache+mod_php is fast enough
for many users. I often seen apache well configured performing better
than nginx+fpm.

On windows, things are slightly different, because of TSRM. Without it
(LTS), it is almost as fast (basic config).

However, as much as I like to get php faster, it should not be the
main argument for everything. And definitively not in this case, I do
not see any gain for us to kill mod_php support.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org

Thread (123 messages)

« previous php.internals (#74130) next »