static HTML is served by web server and it's irrelevant to PHP performance.
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Thomas Hruska <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 5/5/2014 7:07 AM, Kevin Ingwersen wrote:
>
>> Now I'm glad to present you a result of our recent four month work. It's a
>>> refactoring of the PHP engine that significantly improves performance,
>>> memory usage and builds a foundation for a lot more future performance
>>> improvements incl. JIT. I'll avoid technical details (more details will
>>> be
>>> published at *http://wiki.php.net/phpng <http://wiki.php.net/phpng>*),
>>> but
>>> in few words - we changed the basement trying to keep most of the
>>> building
>>> unchanged. Right now the new engine already makes *10-30% speedup of
>>> php*not only on benchmarks but on real-life applications as well!
>>>
>>> *Some benchmarks we ran so far:*
>>>
>>> Wordpress 3.6 – 20.0% gain (253 vs 211 req/sec)
>>>
>>> Drupal 6.1 – 11.7% gain (1770 vs 1585 req/sec
>>>
>>> Qdig – 15.3% gain (555 vs 482 req/sec)
>>>
>>> ZF test app – 30.5% gain (217 vs 166 req/sec)
>>>
>>
> What's the comparison to serving static HTML through PHP (no PHP tags) on
> the same setup?
>
> --
> Thomas Hruska
> CubicleSoft President
>
> I've got great, time saving software that you will find useful.
>
> http://cubiclesoft.com/
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>