Hi,
I coauthor the pecl extension for oauth; it currently supports >= 5.2 with
only a few compiler directives, but these engine changes are quite
extensive.
My question is how to best approach this to maintain backwards
compatibility?
Thanks!
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Dmitry Stogov <[email protected]> wrote:
> yes. all the extensions will have to be changed.
> In some cases it may be difficult, but usually not too difficult.
> For example today Xinchen added support for 3 or 5 new extensions.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Andrea Faulds <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 5 May 2014, at 15:15, Dmitry Stogov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I would say it must be 100% compatible at the end, may be with exception
> > for very rare and unclear cases that worked just because of existing
> > implementation. (e.g. mixing foreach and next() on the same array).
> >
> >
> > Of course it’s compatible with user land, what I meant to ask was how
> > compatible is the ABI? Would this require a lot of changes to extensions
> > and such?
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Faulds
> > http://ajf.me/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
--
Tjerk