On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Zeev Suraski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 7 במאי 2014, at 09:13, Sebastian Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Playing devil's advocate: does anyone really need SAPIs other than
> > FastCGI, CLI, and embed? And if so: do we care enough to burden
> > ourselves with their maintenance?
> >
>
> I think you just called me "the devil" ;)
>
> Seriously, I can't think of any *real* reason of why anybody would
> need something other than these SAPIs in 2014 (other than FUD).
> Things like ISAPI and other more esoteric SAPIs are no brainers, and
> while mod_php may be a bit more of a leap of faith, it doesn't truly
> brings any tangible benefits over FastCGI (none that can't be
> relatively easily replicated in userland anyway, eg htscanner).
>
> I'd support it.
>
> Zeev
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
You forgot fpm and phpdbg from that list.
A little bit offtopic, but I think it would be nice if we could have some
pecl-like infrastructure to host and install 3rd party sapis without the
need to bundle them with the core.
ps: maybe something like https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=66589 could be
also considered then.
--
Ferenc Kovács
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu