Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement

From: Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 01:56:45 +0000
Subject: Re: phpng: Refactored PHP Engine with Big Performance Improvement
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message 
On May 7, 2014, at 12:49 PM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
>> I recently converted apache2handler to support phpng and it's appeared
>> significantly slower than FastCGI and FPM.
> 
> Do we know why? I would assume since FastCGI has additional data hop
> (between webserver and the actual PHP binary) Apache one would be faster
> but looks like it's not so. It'd be interesting to know why.

I think in some cases the benchmarks I’ve seen are not apples-to-apples. I would also like to see
this on true apples to apples. [assuming no static files are served].

By the way, at some point there was one reason for FastCGI to be faster - php-cgi was non-PIC while
mod_php.so was PIC. But I believe on Linux you can have shared libraries that are non-PIC. [PIC
meaning position independent code].

Andi

Thread (123 messages)

« previous php.internals (#74047) next »